SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities

Exchange Act of 1934

Filed by the Registrant ~~[X]~~ x

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ~~[ ]~~ o

Check the appropriate box: [ ] Preliminary Proxy Statement [ ] Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) [X] Definitive Proxy Statement [ ] Definitive Additional Materials [ ] Soliciting Material Pursuant to Rule 14a-12

o	Preliminary Proxy Statement
o	Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
x	Definitive Proxy Statement
o	Definitive Additional Materials
o	Soliciting Material Pursuant to Rule 14a-12

DOMINI SOCIAL INVESTMENT TRUST ~~(Name~~

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter) ~~(Name~~

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box): [X] No fee required. [ ] Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. 1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: 2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: 3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): 4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: 5) Total fee paid: [ ] Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. [ ] Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. 1) Amount Previously Paid: 2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: 3) Filing Party: 4) Date Filed: ~~Domini Social Bond Fund~~

x	No fee required.
o	Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

Total fee paid:

o	Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

o	Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

Amount Previously Paid:

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

Filing Party:

Date Filed:

DOMINI SOCIAL EQUITY FUND

DOMINI EUROPEAN SOCIAL EQUITY FUND

DOMINI SOCIAL BOND FUND

536 Broadway, ~~7th~~7^th Floor

New York, New York 10012 ~~May 23, 2005~~

www.domini.com

June 15, 2006

Dear Fellow Shareholder:

Thank you for you for your investment in the Domini Funds, and for your continuing commitment to the kind of future that provides universal human dignity.

I am writing today to request your ~~approval~~vote for a number of ~~a new submanager for~~important proposals concerning the management of the Domini Social Equity Fund, the Domini European Social Equity Fund and the Domini Social Bond Fund. ~~Enclosed is a~~

Please read through the proxy statement ~~describing~~carefully. We have made an effort to write as much of this material in plain English as possible, and also prepared a brief overview section to assist you as you make your decision. We hope that you find it helpful.

This package contains the ~~proposal, which will be considered at~~following materials necessary to place your vote:

Table of Contents.

Overviewof Proxy Statement: presented in a question and answer format to provide you with a basic understanding of what you are being asked to decide.

Notice of Special Meeting: provides the date and location of a Special Meeting of Shareholders of the ~~Fund~~Funds, as well as the proposals to be considered at the meeting.

Proxy Statement: describes the proposals that will be considered at the meeting, and contains more detailed information about each proposal.

The Special Meeting will be held on ~~June 28, 2005,~~August 15, 2006, at ~~10:~~11:00 ~~am,~~a.m., Eastern Time, at the offices of Bingham McCutchen LLP, 150 Federal Street, ~~16th~~16^th Floor, Boston, Massachusetts. You are receiving ~~this~~the proxy statement because you were a shareholder of the Domini Social Equity Fund, the Domini European Social Equity Fund, or the Domini Social Bond Fund on ~~May 10, 2005,~~June 1, 2006, and are entitled to vote.

I certainly understand your temptation to set this proxy aside for another day, or to simply ignore it altogether. I strongly encourage you to resist this ~~temptation and cast your vote today. If~~temptation.You will save Fund shareholders additional costs if you vote ~~promptly, you will save the Fund the additional costs required for follow-up mailings and telephone calls.~~promptly. Your vote is important, and voting only takes a few minutes.If the Funds do not receive your vote, their proxy solicitor, DF King, may contact you to help you cast your vote.

You are not required to attend the Special Meeting in order to cast your vote. You may use one of three options to vote your proxy. Please ~~take a few moments to~~ read the enclosed materials and thencast your vote ~~by simply filling out~~ as follows:

•

Mail: Complete,sign and return the enclosed card in the enclosed postage-paid envelope,or

•

Phone: Call the toll-free number printed on your proxy card and follow the instructions,or

Online: Visit the ~~enclosed card, or by using the telephone or Internet voting instructions~~web address printed on your proxy ~~card. As a~~card and follow the instructions.

Each shareholder ~~you~~will cast one vote for each dollar of net asset value ~~represented~~they hold (number of shares owned multiplied by ~~your shares in~~ the ~~Fund. If the Fund does not receive your proxy card, our proxy solicitor, DF King, may~~ ~~contact~~net asset value per share).

Unless you ~~to help you cast your vote. Approval~~are a shareholder of ~~a new submanager for~~ the Domini Social ~~Bond~~Equity Fund, ~~will~~you are not ~~change~~being asked to vote for every proposal. To review which proposals relate to the ~~Fund's investment strategies or investment objective.~~ Funds you own, please see the table included in Part 1 of the proxy statement.

The ~~Fund's~~Funds’ Board of Trustees has carefully reviewed ~~the proposal~~these proposals and has determined that ~~it is~~they are fair and reasonable and in ~~shareholders'~~shareholders’ best interests. The ~~Fund's~~Funds’ Board of Trustees is composed of ~~eight~~seven individuals, ~~seven~~six of whom are unaffiliated with Domini Social Investments LLC, the manager and administrator of the ~~Fund. The Board's~~Funds. Their job is to protect your interests as ~~shareholders.~~ a shareholder.

The Board unanimously recommends that you vote ~~"For" the proposal. We have made an effort to write as much~~“For” each of this material in plain English as possible. Although we encourage you to read through this proxy statement carefully, we have also prepared a brief overview section in order to help make your decision easier. We hope that you find it helpful. these proposals.

Your vote is important. Please take a moment now to vote by completing and mailing your proxy card, or ~~by using~~calling the ~~telephone~~toll-free number or ~~Internet voting instructions~~visiting the web address printed on your proxy card. If you choose to vote by mail, please be sure to sign your proxy card and return it in the enclosed postage-paid envelope. If you have any questions regarding the issues to be voted on, or need assistance in completing your proxy card, please call ~~the telephone number provided on your proxy card. For additional information on the voting process, see Part 2 of the proxy statement.~~ 1-800-423-2107.

Thank you in advance for your participation in this important process.

Sincerely yours, ~~/S/~~

/s/ Amy L. Domini

Amy L. Domini

Chair and President ~~Domini Social Investment Trust~~

TABLE OF CONTENTS


					Page

Overview of Proxy ~~Statement............................................. 1~~ Statement					i

Notice of Special ~~Meeting............................................... 4~~ Meeting					ix

Proxy ~~Statement......................................................... 6~~ Statement					1

	Part 1. ~~Overview.................................................. 7~~	Overview			3

	Part 2.	The Proposals			9

				Proposal 1. To elect a Board of Trustees for each Fund(all shareholders)

				Proposal 2. To approve a new Management Agreement with Domini Social Investments LLC(shareholders of the Domini Social Equity Fund only)

				Proposal 3. To approve a Submanagement Agreement with Wellington Management Company, LLP(shareholders of the Domini Social Equity Fund only)

				Proposal 4. To authorize the Trustees of each Fund to select and change submanagers and enter into submanagement agreements without the approval of shareholders(all shareholders)

	Part 3.		Information Regarding Voting and the Special ~~Meeting...... 8 Part 3. The Proposals............................................. 11~~ Meeting		67

	Part 4.		Information Regarding ~~the Fund............................ 23 Exhibits~~ each Fund		71

Exhibits

Exhibit A ---	Nominating Committee Charter	A-1

Exhibit B -	Proposed Management Agreement with Domini Social Investments LLC	B-1

Exhibit C -	Information Regarding Other Funds Submanaged by Wellington Management Company, LLP with a Similar Investment Objective to the Domini Social Equity Trust	C-1

Exhibit D -	Proposed Submanagement Agreement with ~~Seix Advisors, the fixed-income division of Trusco Capital~~Wellington Management Inc...................... A-1 Exhibit B -- Information Regarding Mutual Funds Managed by Seix Advisors, the fixed-income division of Trusco Capital Management, Inc...................... B-1 Company, LLP	D-1

This page intentionally left blank

- i -

OVERVIEW OF PROXY STATEMENT

A Special Meeting of Shareholders of the Domini Social Equity Fund, the Domini European Social Equity Fund and the Domini Social Bond Fund ~~(the "Fund"~~(together, at times referred to below as the “Funds,” and individually as a “Fund”) will be held at Bingham McCutchen LLP, 150 Federal Street, ~~16th~~16^th Floor, Boston, Massachusetts, on ~~June 28, 2005,~~August 15, 2006, at ~~10:~~11:00 am, Eastern Time, for the purposes described in ~~this~~the proxy statement.

We encourage you to read ~~this~~the proxy statement carefully before casting your vote. We have prepared the following questions and answers ~~in order~~ to help make your decision easier. If you have any further questions, please feel free to call us at ~~1-888-414-5566. Q. What~~1-800-423-2107.

Q.	Why are shareholders of the Domini Social Equity Fund being asked to approve a new Management Agreement with Domini Social Investments LLC (Proposal 2) and a Submanagement Agreement with Wellington Management Company, LLP (Proposal 3)?

A.	These proposals are presented in order to effect a change in strategy for the Domini Social Equity Fund.

Currently, the Domini Social Equity Fund is a passively managed index fund. It must continue to invest in the ~~role~~stocks of the companies included in the Domini 400 Social Index^SM(“the “Index”) in exactly the same proportion as the Index, regardless of how the Index is performing. Management cannot shift the Fund’s portfolio concentration from one industry to another or from one stock to another, to enhance performance.

Domini Social Investments LLC (“Domini”), the Fund’s manager, believes that shareholders would be better served by an active investment strategy.An active investment strategy would provide management with the flexibility to adjust the portfolio as market conditions change. The Fund will continue to seek to provide shareholders with long-term total return.

- ii -

Domini believes that an active investment strategy will allow the Fund to more effectively capitalize on the strengths of social and environmental investment standards. Domini’s review of the long-term track record of the Fund demonstrates that social and environmental analysis has led to strong individual stock selection. Domini believes that social and environmental standards help to identify companies that are led by forward-looking management teams, with positive corporate cultures, and that these companies make better long-term investments. A passive investment strategy, however, limits the Fund’s ability to capitalize on this stock selection advantage, because it requires that the Fund invest in the stocks of all of the companies included in the Index, in exactly the same proportion as the Index.

Domini and Wellington Management Company, LLP (“Wellington Management”) have developed a strategy that is designed to combine the strength of Domini’s social and environmental standards with Wellington Management’s quantitative investment analysis. Domini believes that this new approach will generate positive financial returns to shareholders, while remaining consistent with the Fund’s unwavering commitment to socially responsible investing.

In order to effect this new strategy, Fund shareholders are being asked to approve a new management agreement with Domini, which includes an increase in fees, and the submanagement agreement with Wellington Management, in each case as discussed below.

There is no guarantee that the Fund will be able to achieve its investment objective. The Fund is subject to market risks, and is not insured. Actively managed funds carry different risks than index funds, including the risk that higher portfolio turnover may generate higher taxable distributions to shareholders. There is also a risk that the quantitative model that the submanager uses to select stocks may fail to produce the intended results.

- iii -

Q.	Will this proposed change affect the Fund’s commitment to socially responsible investing?

No. Domini has no intention of changing its steadfast commitment to socially responsible investing. The proposed new investment strategy reflects Domini’s strong belief that the use of social and environmental standards to select investments leads to better stock picking (as well as more responsible corporate behavior). The new strategy that Domini is proposing is designed to strengthen the use of social and environmental standards. The new strategy is also designed to allow the Fund to maintain its strong commitment to shareholder activism.

Domini will maintain exclusive control over the definition and application of its social and environmental standards. Wellington Management will not be permitted to purchase any securities that have not been approved by Domini.

Q.	If Proposals 2 and 3 are approved, how will securities be selected for the Fund?

A.	The proposed investment process consists of two basic components – Domini’s social and environmental analysis and Wellington Management’s quantitative approach.

Domini’s in-house research department will analyze a universe of approximately 1,000 of the largest U.S. companies using Domini’s social and environmental standards. These standards are maintained by a Standards Committee that includes Amy Domini, Domini’s Founder and CEO, and Steven Lydenberg, Domini’s Chief Investment Officer. Domini will provide Wellington Management with a list of securities that it determines are consistent with these standards. Domini will periodically review and update this list of approved stocks based on its ongoing social and environmental analysis.

As submanager for the Fund, Wellington Management will employ an active investment strategy seeking to provide shareholders with long-term total return by investing primarily in stocks of U.S. companies that have been approved by Domini.

- iv -

Wellington Management will seek to add value using a diversified quantitative stock selection approach, while managing risk through portfolio construction. Using a proprietary quantitative model, Wellington Management will rank securities according to value and momentum characteristics, and will seek to invest in those stocks that it believes are undervalued by the market and whose fundamental and technical momentum attributes are attractive. Wellington Management will also use optimization techniques designed to reduce industry and sector biases.

There will be no requirement that every security that is approved by Domini for investment be owned by the Fund. However, as noted above, Wellington Management will not be permitted to purchase any securities that have not been approved by Domini.

The Fund’s performance benchmark will remain the S&P 500.

Q.	If the new Management Agreement with Domini is approved, will shareholders of the Domini Social Equity Fund pay higher expenses?

Yes. Because Domini will need to pay more in submanagement fees and will be providing additional services with respect to the management of the Domini Social Equity Fund, Domini is proposing to increase its fees. This will result in an increase in the expenses that shareholders will pay.Domini believes that the new active investment strategy it is proposing will result in enhanced financial returns to shareholders and that the proposed expenses are fair and reasonable.

Please note that if the new management agreement and the submanagement agreement with Wellington Management are approved, Domini will contractually agree to cap expenses for the Investor share class to 1.15% until at least November 30, 2007, subject to annual renewal.

The Fund’s Board of Trustees has carefully reviewed a comparison between the proposed fees (both before and after

- v -

giving effect to the proposed expense cap) and the fees of similar funds. In its review, the Board noted that the proposed expenses to shareholders are below the industry average of the relevant peer group. In addition, during its review of the submanagement agreement between Domini and Wellington Management (the subject of Proposal 3), the Board evaluated Wellington Management’s fees and the fees other funds of comparable size pay for submanagement services. A more complete discussion of the factors considered by the Board of ~~Trustees? A.~~ Trustees is provided in Part 2 of the proxy statement.

The Board of Trustees has determined that the ~~important responsibility of protecting your interests as shareholders. It oversees the operations of the Fund, and makes sure that all decisions~~proposed fees are fair and reasonable to Fund shareholders.

Q.	Why are shareholders of the Domini Social Equity Fund being asked to approve the submanagement agreement with Wellington Management Company, LLP?

In order to effect the change in strategy discussed above, Wellington Management is being proposed as the new submanager of the Domini Social Equity Trust (the fund in which the Domini Social Equity Fund invests substantially all of its assets). If the new management agreement and the submanagement agreement with Wellington Management are approved, Wellington Management will replace SSgA Funds Management, Inc. as the submanager of the Domini Social Equity Trust on November 30, 2006.

As of April 30, 2006, Wellington Management managed approximately $550 billion in ~~your best interests. The Fund's Board of Trustees~~assets, and has been in operation for more than 70 years. Wellington Management is made up of eight individuals, seven of whom are "independent" meaning that they have no formal affiliation with Domini Social Investments LLC ("Domini") (the manager of the Fund) or the Fund except in the role they play as Trustees. In addition, the Trustees are represented by independent legal counsel to further ensure that shareholder interests remain paramount. Q. Why are shareholders of the Fund being asked to approve the submanagement agreement with Seix Advisors? A. On March 1, 2005, Domini replaced ShoreBank with Seix Advisors, the fixed-income division of Trusco Capital Management, Inc., as the submanager of the Domini European Social ~~Bond Fund. Shareholders of the Fund are being asked~~Equity Trust, and manages approximately $24.2 billion in assets subject to ~~approve the submanagement agreement with Seix Advisors in accordance with applicable law. Trusco Capital Management is a wholly owned subsidiary of SunTrust Banks, Inc. As~~social or environmental standards, as of March 31, ~~2005, Trusco Capital Management managed more than $69.6 billion in assets.~~ ~~-2-~~ 2006.

The Board of Trustees carefully reviewed ~~Seix Advisors'~~Wellington Management’s capabilities and track record and unanimously approved its selection. WeDomini and the Board believe that ~~Seix Advisors~~Wellington Management will be able to provide the ~~Fund~~Domini Social Equity Trust with strong, long-term service. ~~Q. How does~~

- vi -

Q.	Why are shareholders of each Fund being asked to authorize the Trustees to select and change submanagers and enter into submanagement agreements in the future without the approval of shareholders?

The intention of this proposal is to provide the Trustees the flexibility to change a Fund’s submanager in the future, should this be deemed necessary, without having to go through the substantial time and expense of a shareholder proxy. Approval of this proposal will facilitate the efficient supervision and management of the Funds by Domini and the Trustees. Any proposed submanager changes would still need to be reviewed and approved by the Trustees. This proposal would not give Domini the authority to replace a submanager without Trustee approval.

In addition to shareholder approval of Proposal 4, each Fund will need to obtain exemptive relief from the ~~Board of~~Securities and Exchange Commission for its Trustees ~~recommend~~to be able to select and change investment submanagers and enter into investment submanagement agreements in the future without shareholder approval.

Please note that ~~I vote? A. The Board of Trustees has carefully reviewed the~~this proposal ~~to approve a new submanagement agreement with Seix Advisors and unanimously recommends that you vote FOR the proposal on the enclosed proxy card. A discussion of the factors that~~would not permit the Trustees ~~considered before granting their approval is included in Part 3 of this proxy statement. Q. If the proposal~~ to ~~approve the submanagement agreement with Seix Advisors is approved, will there be any change in~~replace Domini Social Investments LLC as the investment ~~strategies used by the Fund? A. No. There is no current intention to change~~manager of any of the Funds without complying with the Investment Company Act of 1940 and applicable regulations governing shareholder approval of investment ~~strategies or the investment objectives~~advisory contracts.

Q.	What is the role of the Board of Trustees?

The Board of Trustees has the important responsibility of protecting your interests as a Domini Funds shareholder. One board consisting of seven individuals, six of whom are “independent”, oversees the operations of each of the Funds. The Trustees act as your representatives, and base their decisions on your best interests as a Fund shareholder. In addition, the independent Trustees are represented by independent legal counsel to provide counsel and guidance in connection with determining the best interests of shareholders.

- vii -

Proposal 1 seeks your approval of the ~~Fund, including the Fund's commitment to principles~~current Board of ~~socially responsible investing. We are asking you to approve the proposal described in this proxy statement because we believe,~~Trustees. You may read their biographies and learn more about the Board ~~of Trustees believes, that it is~~ in your best interests. Q. If the proposal to approve the submanagement agreement with Seix Advisors is approved, will this affect the expenses that Fund shareholders must pay? A. No. ApprovalPart 2 of the submanagement agreement will have no effect upon the amount of advisory fees paid by Fund shareholders. The expense of Seix Advisors' submanagement fees is borne by Domini, not by the Fund or its shareholders. Q. What role will Seix Advisors play in managing the Fund? A. As submanager for the Domini Social Bond Fund, Seix Advisors will be responsible for the day-to-day management of the Fund. In -3- addition, Seix Advisors will provide Domini with various reports that Domini requires to supervise the management of the Fund. Q. Why did Domini decide to terminate the Fund's submanagement agreement with ShoreBank? A. Domini has enjoyed a long and collegial relationship with ShoreBank, the nation's first and leading community development and environmental banking corporation. Domini continues to offer the Domini Money Market Account, a pass-through account to ShoreBank that allows our investors to use their cash to support the bank's community development work. When Domini launched the Domini Social Bond Fund, the Fund was the first mutual fund to be submanaged by a community development financial institution. Domini and ShoreBank are proud of that achievement, and of our work together to build the Fund to where it is today. However, the Fund was ShoreBank's only mutual fund client, and as assets grew we came to the mutual recognition that the Fund's shareholders would be best served by an investment adviser managing other mutual funds, such as Seix Advisors. Q. How do I vote? A. You can vote by mail, by telephone, or on the Internet. Please see the instructions set forth on the top portion of the enclosed proxy card. You can also vote in person, by attending the Special Meeting of Shareholders. The meeting will be held at Bingham McCutchen LLP, 150 Federal Street, 16th Floor, Boston, Massachusetts, on June 28, 2005, at 10:00 am, Eastern Time. You do not need to attend in person in order to cast your vote. ~~-4-~~ statement.

Q.	How does the Board of Trustees recommend that I vote?

The Board of Trustees has carefully reviewed each of the proposals presented in the proxy statement, and unanimously recommends that shareholders voteFOReach proposal on the enclosed proxy card(s). A discussion of the factors that the Trustees considered before granting their approval is included in Part 2 of the proxy statement.

Q.	How do I vote?

A.	You can vote one of four ways:

Mail: Complete,sign and mail your proxy card using the enclosed postage-paid envelope.

Phone: Call the toll-free number printed on your proxy card and follow the instructions.

Online: Visit the web address printed on your proxy card, and follow the instructions.

In person at the Special Meeting of Shareholders.

Q.	I am not a shareholder of all of the Funds. How do I know which proposals to vote on?

A.	Please refer to the table in Part 1 of the proxy statement to determine which proposals apply to you.

- viii -

This page intentionally left blank

- ix -

DOMINI SOCIAL EQUITY FUND

DOMINI EUROPEAN SOCIAL EQUITY FUND

DOMINI SOCIAL BOND FUND

536 Broadway, ~~7th~~7^th Floor

New York, New York 10012 ~~Telephone: (800) 582-6757~~

www.domini.com

NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING

OF SHAREHOLDERS

To be held Tuesday, ~~June 28, 2005~~ August 15, 2006

A Special Meeting of Shareholders of the Domini Social Equity Fund, the Domini European Social Equity Fund, and the Domini Social Bond Fund ~~(the "Fund"~~(together, the “Funds”, and individually a “Fund”) will be held at Bingham McCutchen LLP, 150 Federal Street, ~~16th~~16^th Floor, Boston Massachusetts, on Tuesday, ~~June 28, 2005,~~August 15, 2006, at ~~10:~~11:00 am, Eastern Time, for the purposes listed below.

Please review the proposals listed below carefully and be sure to vote on each proposal onfor which you are ~~asked~~eligible to vote. ~~Proposal 1. To approve a Submanagement Agreement for~~For more complete information on the ~~Fund between Seix Advisors,~~proposals, please refer to the ~~fixed-income division of Trusco Capital Management, Inc.,~~proxy statement included in this package.

	Proposal 1.	To be voted on by shareholders of all Funds:

		To elect a Board of Trustees.

	Proposal 2.	To be voted on by shareholders of the Domini Social Equity Fund only:

		To approve a new Management Agreement between the Domini Social Equity Trust and Domini Social Investments LLC.

- x -

	Proposal 3.	To be voted on by shareholders of the Domini Social Equity Fund only:

		To approve a Submanagement Agreement for the Domini Social Equity Trust between Wellington Management Company, LLP and Domini Social Investments LLC.

	Proposal 4.	To be voted on by shareholders of all of the Funds:

		To authorize the Trustees to select and change submanagers and enter into submanagement agreements without the approval of shareholders.

Shareholders may consider and ~~Domini Social Investments LLC.~~ ~~-5- Proposal 2. To transact~~vote upon such other business as may properly come before the Special Meeting of Shareholders and any adjournments or postponements of the Special Meeting.

The Board of Trustees of the ~~Fund~~Funds unanimously recommends that you vote ~~in favor of Proposal 1.~~ “FOR” each proposal.

Only Fund shareholders of record on ~~May 10, 2005,~~June 1, 2006, will be entitled to vote at the Special Meeting of Shareholders and at any adjournments or postponements thereof.

Carole M. Laible, Treasurer ~~May 23, 2005~~

June 15, 2006

YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT. If you promptly vote, sign, and return the enclosed proxy card(s), you will help Fund shareholders avoid the additional expense of a second solicitation. The enclosed postage-paid envelope ~~requires no postage and~~ is provided for your convenience. ~~-6-~~ You may also vote by calling the toll-free number on the enclosed proxy card(s), or by visiting the web site address listed on the enclosed proxy card(s).

- 1 -

DOMINI SOCIAL EQUITY FUND

DOMINI EUROPEAN SOCIAL EQUITY FUND

DOMINI SOCIAL BOND FUND

536 Broadway, ~~7th~~7^th Floor

New York, New York 10012 ~~Telephone: (800) 582-6757~~

www.domini.com

PROXY STATEMENT

This ~~Proxy Statement~~proxy statement is being furnished to you in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the Board of Trustees of the Domini Social Equity Fund, the Domini European Social Equity Fund, and the Domini Social Bond Fund ~~(the "Fund"~~(together, the “Funds” and individually a “Fund”) for use at a Special Meeting of Shareholders of the ~~Fund,~~Funds, or any adjournment or postponement thereof, to be held at Bingham McCutchen LLP, 150 Federal Street, ~~16th~~16^th Floor, Boston, Massachusetts 02110, on Tuesday, ~~June 28, 2005,~~August 15, 2006, at ~~10:~~11:00 am, Eastern Time, for the purposes set forth in the accompanying Notice of Special Meeting. ~~This Proxy Statement~~In this proxy statement, the Domini Social Equity Fund is ~~divided into~~sometimes referred to as the ~~following four parts: Part 1. Overview. Pages 7 Part 2. Information Regarding Voting~~“Equity Fund”, the Domini European Social Equity Fund is sometimes referred to as the “European Equity Fund” and the ~~Special Meeting. Pages 8-10 Part 3. The Proposals. Pages 11-22 Part 4. Information Regarding~~Domini Social Bond Fund is sometimes referred to as the ~~Fund. Pages 23-24~~ “Bond Fund”.

Each Fund’s Annual Report for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2005, including audited financial statements, and Semi-Annual Report for the period ended January 31, 2006, has previously been sent to shareholders. Both reports are available without charge by written request to Domini Funds, P.O. Box 9785, Providence, RI 02940-9785, by calling Domini at 1-800-582-6757, or by downloading the reports from our website atwww.domini.com.

This proxy statement is divided into the following four parts:

- 2 -

	Part 1.	Overview.

	Part 2.	The Proposals.

	Part 3.	Information Regarding Voting and the Special Meeting.

	Part 4.	Information Regarding the Funds.

This ~~Proxy Statement~~proxy statement and the enclosed proxy ~~card~~card(s) were first mailed to shareholders on or about ~~May 23, 2005.~~ ~~-7- PART 1. OVERVIEW.~~ June 15, 2006.

- 3 -

PART 1.

OVERVIEW.

The Board of Trustees of the ~~Domini Social Bond Fund~~Funds has called a Special Meeting of Shareholders for the purposes described in the accompanying Notice of Special Meeting and as summarized below. The purpose of this ~~Proxy Statement~~proxy statement is to provide you with additional information regarding the ~~proposal to approve the submanagement agreement with Seix Advisors~~proposals to be voted on at the meeting and to request your vote in favor of the ~~proposal.~~ proposals.

The following table lists the proposals, the affected Funds and the pages of this proxy statement where the proposals are discussed in detail:

PROPOSAL

FUND WHOSE SHAREHOLDERS ARE ENTITLED TO VOTE

PAGE

To elect a Board of Trustees.

Domini Social Equity Fund

Domini European Social Equity Fund

Domini Social Bond Fund

To approve a new Management Agreement with Domini Social Investments LLC.

Domini Social Equity Fund

To approve a Submanagement Agreement with Wellington Management Company, LLP.

Domini Social Equity Fund

To authorize the Trustees to select and change submanagers and enter into submanagement agreements without the approval of shareholders.

Domini Social Equity Fund

Domini European Social Equity Fund

Domini Social Bond Fund

- 4 -

Master/Feeder Fund Structure

Each of the Domini Social Equity Fund and the Domini European Social Equity Fund is ~~an open-end~~a “feeder fund” in a “master/feeder” fund structure. This means that the Fund does not invest directly in a portfolio of securities. Instead, it seeks to achieve its investment ~~company, or mutual fund. The Fund seeks a high level of current income and total return~~objective by investing in ~~bonds~~a “master fund” that has the same investment objective and ~~other debt instruments that pass multiple, broad-based social and environmental screens. The~~policies. Accordingly, the Equity Fund ~~currently employs~~invests substantially all of its assets in the Domini Social ~~Investments LLC ("Domini"~~Equity Trust (the “Master Equity Fund”) and the European Equity Fund invests substantially all of its assets in the Domini European Social Equity Trust (the “Master European Fund”). Each of the Master Equity Fund and the Master European Fund are sometimes referred to in this proxy statement as a “Master Fund” and, together, as the “Master Funds”.

Each Master Fund has asked its ~~investment manager. Prior~~investors, including each feeder fund, to ~~March 1, 2005, Domini employed ShoreBank~~vote on certain matters at a meeting of that Master Fund’s investors. Under applicable law, each of the Equity Fund and the European Equity Fund, when asked to vote on matters as an ~~investment submanager~~investor in a Master Fund, must either seek instructions from Fund shareholders and vote in accordance with those instructions, or vote its interest in the Master Fund in the same proportion as the vote of all other investors in the Master Fund. Fund shareholders are being asked to ~~manage the investments of the Fund~~vote on ~~a day-to-day basis. At the regular meeting of~~certain proposals described in this proxy statement because the Board of Trustees ~~held~~has decided to seek instructions from the shareholders of each of the Equity Fund and the European Equity Fund on ~~January 28, 2005,~~how to vote on these matters. This in effect allows the Fund shareholders to have the same voting rights as if they were direct investors in the Master Fund.

Because there are investors in each Master Fund besides the Equity Fund and the European Equity Fund, it is possible that a Proposal concerning a Master Fund will not be approved by the requisite vote, even if the Proposal is approved by a majority of the outstanding voting securities of the applicable Fund. It is also possible that a Proposal concerning a Master Fund will be approved by the requisite vote, even if the Proposal is not approved by a majority of the outstanding voting securities of the applicable Fund.

The Bond Fund invests directly in a portfolio of securities and not in a “master/feeder” fund structure.

- 5 -

Summary of Proposals

Proposal 1.

To be voted on by all shareholders:

To Elect a Board of Trustees ~~voted~~.

The Funds are proposing that you elect Amy L. Domini, Julia Elizabeth Harris, Kirsten S. Moy, William C. Osborn, Karen Paul, Gregory A. Ratliff and John L. Shields as Trustees of the Funds. Each of the Domini Social Equity Fund and the Domini European Social Equity Fund, as an investor in a Master Fund, is also asking its shareholders to ~~terminate~~vote in favor of the ~~submanagement agreement~~election of the same individuals to serve as Trustees of that Master Fund. Each of the nominees is currently a Trustee of the Funds and the Master Funds. See Proposal 1 in Part 2 of this proxy statement for more information.

	Proposal 2.	To be voted on by shareholders of the Domini Social Equity Fund only:

		To approve a new Management Agreement between the Domini Social Equity Trust and Domini Social Investments LLC.

Currently, the Domini Social Equity Trust (the Master Fund in which the Equity Fund invests) is passively managed. Domini believes that shareholders would be better served if management pursued an active investment strategy. An active investment strategy would provide management with the flexibility to adjust the portfolio as market conditions change. Because of the increased expenses that Domini will need to pay if the Master Equity Fund pursues an active investment strategy, Domini has determined it is necessary to increase its management fee. Domini believes that the proposed new strategy will result in enhanced financial returns to shareholders and that the proposed new management fee is fair and reasonable.

Shareholders are being asked to approve a new Management Agreement that will reflect the proposed increase in the management fee. Other than the increased management fee, the new Management Agreement is the same as the Management Agreement currently in

- 6 -

effect. See Proposal 2 in Part 2 of this proxy statement for more information.

	Proposal 3.	To be voted on by shareholders of the Domini Social Equity Fund only:

		To approve a Submanagement Agreement for the Domini Social Equity Trust between Wellington Management Company, LLP and Domini Social Investments LLC.

In order to execute the change from a passive investment strategy to an active investment strategy, Wellington Management is being proposed as the new submanager of the Domini Social Equity Trust. Domini and ~~ShoreBank as~~Wellington Management have developed a strategy that is designed to combine the strength of ~~February 28, 2005,~~Domini’s social and ~~authorized Domini~~environmental standards with Wellington Management’s quantitative analysis.

Shareholders are asked to ~~enter into~~approve a submanagement agreement with ~~Seix Advisors,~~Wellington Management. If the ~~fixed-income division of Trusco Capital~~new Management ~~Inc. The~~Agreement and submanagement agreement with ~~Seix Advisors went~~Wellington Management are approved, they will go into effect on ~~March 1, 2005. In accordance with the requirements~~November 30, 2006. See Proposal 3 in Part 2 of this proxy statement for more information.

	Proposal 4.	To be voted on by all shareholders:

		To authorize the Trustees to select and change investment submanagers and enter into investment submanagement agreements without the approval of shareholders.

The Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the ~~"1940 Act"~~“1940 Act”) requires that all investment management and submanagement contracts be approved by shareholders. The Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) has previously provided exemptions from the requirement that shareholders approve of submanagement contracts

- 7 -

as long as certain conditions are satisfied, including shareholder approval of this proposal.

If this proposal is approved and the Funds obtain similar exemptive relief from the SEC, the Trustees will be able to select and change investment submanagers without obtaining the approval of shareholders. The Trustees will not, however, be able to replace Domini as the investment manager without complying with the 1940 Act and applicable regulations governing shareholder approval of investment management contracts. Any proposed submanager changes will still need to be reviewed and approved by the Trustees.

Each Master Fund is also asking its investors to vote on this matter. By voting in favor of Proposal 4, shareholders of the Domini Social Equity Fund and the Domini European Social Equity Fund will be authorizing the respective Fund to vote in favor of this matter at the meeting of the Master Fund’s investors. See Proposal 4 in Part 2 of this proxy statement for more information.

- 8 -

This page intentionally left blank

- 9 -

PART 2.

THE PROPOSALS.

Proposal 1.

To elect a Board of Trustees

You are being asked to elect a Board of Trustees of the Funds. The nominees for the Board of Trustees of the Funds are Amy L. Domini, Julia Elizabeth Harris, Kirsten S. Moy, William C. Osborn, Karen Paul, Gregory A. Ratliff, and John L. Shields. All nominees are currently Trustees of the Funds. As reflected in the table below, six of the seven nominees are not “interested persons” within the meaning of the 1940 Act and are sometimes referred to in this proxy statement as “Independent Trustees”. As discussed below, the Board maintains an audit and nominating committee, both of which consist entirely of Independent Trustees. The Board includes five women or minorities (without double counting).

At a meeting of the Master Funds’ investors, each of the Domini Social Equity Fund and the Domini European Social Equity Fund will be asked to elect the same nominees as Trustees of the Master Funds. By voting for any of the nominees to the Board of Trustees of the Funds, shareholders of the Equity Fund and the European Equity Fund will be authorizing the respective Fund to vote for that nominee at the meeting of the Master Fund’s investors.

Neither the Funds nor the Master Funds hold annual shareholder meetings for the purpose of electing Trustees, and Trustees are not elected for fixed terms.This means that each Trustee will be elected to hold office until his or her successor is elected or until he or she retires, resigns, dies, or is removed from office.Under the Declaration of Trust for each of the Funds and the Master Funds, the number of trustees has been fixed at eight. Mr. Frederick C. Williamson Sr. retired from the Board effective May 1, 2006. Proxies cannot be voted for a greater number of persons than the number of nominees named. The Board of Trustees of the Funds and the Master Funds has adopted a policy governing the tenure and retirement of the Independent Trustees. Under this policy, each Independent Trustee will serve for ten years. New Trustees shall be added every five years. The policy provides that Mr. Osborn and Ms. Paul will retire in 2010 and be replaced by two new trustees that will serve a ten year term; two of Ms. Harris, Ms. Moy and Mr. Ratliff will

- 10 -

retire in 2015 and be replaced by two new trustees that will serve a ten year term; and Mr. Shields and the Trustee out of the group of Ms. Harris, Ms. Moy and Mr. Ratliff who did not retire in 2015 will retire in 2017 and be replaced by two trustees who will serve a ten year term.

In addition to serving as Trustees and officers of the Funds and Master Funds, each Trustee and officer also serves in the same capacity for the Domini Social Equity Portfolio, the Domini European Social Equity Portfolio and the Domini Institutional Social Equity Fund (which funds, collectively with the Funds and the Master Funds, are referred to herein as the “Domini Funds” or the “Domini Family of Funds”).

No Trustee or officer is a director of a public company or a registered investment company other than, with respect to the Trustees, the Domini Funds. Each of the nominees has consented to being named in this proxy statement and to serving on the Board of Trustees if elected.

The following table presents information about each Trustee and each officer of the Funds and the Master Funds as of May 1, 2006. Asterisks indicate those trustees and officers who are “interested persons” (as defined in the 1940 Act) of the Funds and the Master Funds. Each Trustee and officer noted as an interested person is interested by virtue of his or her position with Domini Social Investments LLC, as described below. Unless otherwise indicated below, the address of each Trustee and officer is 536 Broadway, 7^th Floor, New York, NY 10012.

- 11 -

Trustees and Officers

Name

Position(s) Held with the Funds and Master Funds and Length of Time Served

Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years

Number of Domini Funds Overseen by Trustee

Other Directorships Held⁽¹⁾

Interested Trustee and Officer:

Amy L. Domini*

Age: 56

Chair, Trustee, and President of the Funds and the Master Funds since 1990

CEO (since 2002), President (2002-June 2005), and Manager (since 1997), Domini Social Investments LLC; Manager, DSIL Investment Services LLC (since 1998); Manager, Domini Holdings LLC (holding company) (since 2002); Tom’s of Maine, Inc. (natural care products) (2004); Board Member, Progressive Government Institute (nonprofit education on executive branch of the federal government) (since 2003); Board Member, Financial Markets Center (nonprofit financial markets research and education resources provider) (2002-2004);

None

- 12 -

Name	Position(s) Held with the Funds and Master Funds and Length of Time Served	Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years	Number of Domini Funds Overseen by Trustee	Other Directorships Held⁽¹⁾
		Trustee,New England Quarterly(periodical) (since 1998); Trustee, Episcopal Church Pension Fund (since 1994); CEO, Secretary, and Treasurer, KLD Research & Analytics, Inc. (social research provider) (1990-2000); Private Trustee, Loring, Wolcott & Coolidge Office (fiduciary) (since 1987).
Independent Trustees:
Julia Elizabeth Harris Age: 57	Trustee of the Funds and the Master Funds since 1999	Director and President, Alpha Global Solutions, LLC (agribusiness) (since 2004); Trustee, Fiduciary Trust Company (financial institution) (since 2001); Vice President, UNC Partners, Inc. (financial management) (since 1990).	8	None

- 13 -

Name

Position(s) Held with the Funds and Master Funds and Length of Time Served

Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years

Number of Domini Funds Overseen by Trustee

Other Directorships Held⁽¹⁾

Kirsten S. Moy

Age: 58

Trustee of the Funds and the Master Funds since 1999

Board Member, Community Reinvestment Fund (since 2003); Director, Economic Opportunities Program, The Aspen Institute (research and education) (since 2001); Director, NCB Development Corp. (since 2006); Consultant on Social Investments, Equitable Life/AXA (1998-2001); Project Director, Community Development Innovation and Infrastructure Initiative (research) (1998-2001).

None

William C. Osborn

Age: 61

Trustee of the Funds since 1990

Trustee of the Master Funds since 1997

Manager, Massachusetts Green Energy Fund Management 1, LLC (venture capital) (since 2004); Manager, Commons Capital Management LLC (venture capital) (since 2000); Special Partner/Consultant, Arete Corporation (venture capital) (since 1999); Director, CTP Hydrogen, Inc. (since 2005); Director, World Power Technologies, Inc. (power equipment production) (1999-2004); Director, Investors’ Circle (socially responsible investor network) (1999-2004).

None

- 14 -

Name

Position(s) Held with the Funds and Master Funds and Length of Time Served

Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years

Number of Domini Funds Overseen by Trustee

Other Directorships Held⁽¹⁾

Karen Paul

Age: 61

Trustee of the Funds since 1990

Trustee of the Master Funds since 1997

Professor of Management and International Business, Florida International University (since 1990); Visiting Professor, Escuela Graduado Administración Dirección Empresas, Instituto Tecnológico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey (2004); Professor, Catholic University of Bolivia (2003); Fulbright Fellow, U.S. Department of State (2003).

None

Gregory A. Ratliff

Age: 45

Trustee of the Funds and the Master Funds since 1999

Community Investment Consultant (self-employment) (since 2002); Senior Fellow, The Aspen Institute (research and education) (2002); Director, Economic Opportunity, John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation (private philanthropy) (1997-2002).

None

- 15 -

Name

Position(s) Held with the Funds and Master Funds and Length of Time Served

Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years

Number of Domini Funds Overseen by Trustee

Other Directorships Held⁽¹⁾

John L. Shields

Age: 53

Trustee of the Funds and the Master Funds since 2004

CEO, Open Investing, Inc. (investment adviser) (since 2006); Advisory Board Member, Vestmark, Inc. (software company) (since 2003); CEO, Harris Insight Funds Trust (mutual funds) (2005-2006); Managing Director, Navigant Consulting, Inc. (management consulting firm) (2004-2006); Managing Principal, Shields Smith & Webber LLC (management consulting firm) (2002-2004); President and CEO, Citizens Advisers, Inc. (1998-2002); President and CEO, Citizens Securities, Inc. (1998-2002); President and Trustee, Citizens Funds (1998-2002).

None

- 16 -

Name	Position(s) Held with the Funds and Master Funds and Length of Time Served	Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years	Number of Domini Funds Overseen by Trustee	Other Directorships Held⁽¹⁾
Officers:
Megan L. Dunphy* Age: 36	Secretary of the Funds and the Master Funds since 2005	Mutual Fund Counsel, Domini Social Investments LLC (since 2005); Secretary, Domini Funds (since 2005); Counsel, ING (formerly Aetna Financial Services) (financial services) (1999-2004).	N/A	N/A
Adam M. Kanzer* Age: 40	Chief Legal Officer of the Funds and the Master Funds since 2003	General Counsel and Director of Shareholder Advocacy (since 1998) and Chief Compliance Officer (April 2005-May 2005), Domini Social Investments LLC; Chief Legal Officer (since 2003) and Chief Compliance Officer (April 2005-July 2005), Domini Funds.	N/A	N/A

- 17 -

Name

Position(s) Held with the Funds and Master Funds and Length of Time Served

Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years

Number of Domini Funds Overseen by Trustee

Other Directorships Held⁽¹⁾

Carole M. Laible*

Age: 42

Treasurer of the Funds and the Master Funds since 1997

President (since July 2005), Chief Operating Officer (since 2002) and Financial/ Compliance Officer (1997-2003), Domini Social Investments LLC; President and CEO (since 2002), Chief Compliance Officer (since 2001), Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, and Treasurer (since 1998), DSIL Investment Services LLC; Treasurer, Domini Funds (since 1997).

N/A

- 18 -

Name

Position(s) Held with the Funds and Master Funds and Length of Time Served

Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years

Number of Domini Funds Overseen by Trustee

Other Directorships Held⁽¹⁾

Steven D. Lydenberg*

Age: 60

Vice President of the Funds and the Master Funds since 1990

Chief Investment Officer (since 2003) and Member (since 1997), Domini Social Investments LLC; Director (1990-2003) and Director of Research (1990-2001), KLD Research & Analytics, Inc. (social research provider); Vice President, Domini Funds (since 1990).

N/A

Maurizio Tallini*

Age: 32

Chief Compliance Officer of the Funds and the Master Funds since July 2005

Chief Compliance Officer, Domini Social Investments LLC (since May 2005); Chief Compliance Officer, Domini Funds (since July 2005); Venture Capital Controller, Rho Capital Partners (venture capital) (2001-2005); Manager, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (independent registered public accounting firm) (1995-2001).

N/A

⁽¹⁾ This includes all directorships (other than those of the Domini Funds) that are held by each Trustee as a director of a public company or a registered investment company.

* “Interested persons” (as defined by the 1940 Act) of the Funds and the Master Funds, by virtue of his or her position with Domini.

- 19 -

Compensation of Trustees

Information regarding compensation paid to the Trustees for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2005 is set forth below. Ms. Domini is not compensated for her service as a Trustee because of her affiliation with Domini Social Investments LLC.

Each of the Independent Trustees receives an annual retainer for serving as a Trustee of the Domini Funds of $10,000, and in addition, receives $1,500 for attendance at each joint meeting of the Boards (reduced to $625 in the event that a Trustee participates at an in-person meeting by telephone). In addition, each Trustee receives reimbursement for reasonable expenses incurred in attending meetings.

The Funds and the Master Funds do not contribute to a retirement plan for the Trustees. The officers do not receive any direct remuneration from the Funds or the Master Funds.

Name of Trustee	Aggregate Compen-sation from the Funds⁽¹⁾	Aggregate Compen-sation from the Master Funds⁽¹⁾	Pension or Retirement Benefits Accrued as Part of Fund Expenses	Estimated Annual Benefits Upon Retirement	Total Compensation from the Domini Family of Funds Paid to the Trustee⁽²⁾
Interested Trustee:
Amy L. Domini	None	None	None	None	None
Independent Trustees:
Julia Elizabeth Harris	$7,419.62	$8,369.89	None	None	$16,875
Kirsten S. Moy	$7,699.32	$8,673.87	None	None	$17,500
William C. Osborn	$7,972.92	$8,983.59	None	None	$18,125
Karen Paul	$7,146.02	$8,054.17	None	None	$16,250
Gregory A. Ratliff	$7,695.21	$8,674.12	None	None	$17,500
John L. Shields	$7,972.92	$8,363.26	None	None	$18,125

- 20 -

⁽¹⁾For the fiscal year ended July 31, 2005, Independent Trustees received $1,250 for attendance in person ($625 for telephonic attendance) at each joint meeting of the Boards.

⁽²⁾As of July 31, 2005, there were five funds in the Domini family of funds.

Fund Shares Owned by Trustees

The following table shows the dollar range of equity securities beneficially owned by each Trustee in the Funds and the Domini Family of Funds as of June 1, 2006.

Name of Trustee	Dollar Range of Equity Securities in the Equity Fund	Dollar Range of Equity Securities in the European Equity Fund	Dollar Range of Equity Securities in the Bond Fund	Aggregate Dollar Range of Equity Securities in All Investment Companies Overseen by the Trustee in the Domini Family of Funds
Interested Trustee:
Amy L. Domini	Over $100,000	$10,001-$50,000	$10,001-$50,000	Over $100,000
Independent Trustees:
Julia Elizabeth Harris	$1-$10,000	$0	$0	$1-$10,000
Kirsten S. Moy	$10,001-$50,000	$1-$10,000	$0	$10,001-$50,000
William C. Osborn	Over $100,000	$50,001-$100,000	$0	Over $100,000
Karen Paul	$50,001-$100,000	$1-$10,000	$1-$10,000	$50,001-$100,000
Gregory A. Ratliff	$10,001-$50,000	$0	$0	$10,001-$50,000
John L. Shields	$10,001-$50,000	$0	$0	$10,001-$50,000

As of June 1, 2006, none of the Independent Trustees of the Funds, or their immediate family members, owned beneficially or of record any securities of Domini, DSIL Investment Services LLC, the Funds’ distributor and Master Funds’ placement agent, or any person controlling, controlled by or under common control with Domini or DSIL Investment Services LLC.

- 21 -

As of June 1, 2006, the Trustees and officers of the Funds and Master Funds, individually and as a group, owned beneficially or had the right to vote less than 1% of the outstanding shares of each Fund or Master Fund. The Loring, Wolcott & Coolidge Office, a family office that provides fiduciary services, holds shares of the Funds on behalf of their clients and has the right to vote 0.21% of the Equity Fund, 0.87% of the Bond Fund, and 35.29% of the European Equity Fund. Amy L. Domini is a trustee at the Loring, Wolcott & Coolidge Office.

Board Meetings

During the fiscal year ended July 31, 2005, the Board of Trustees met six times. Each Trustee attended at least 75% of the meetings during the fiscal year ended July 31, 2005.

Committees

The Board of Trustees has a standing Audit Committee composed of all of the Independent Trustees. The Audit Committee met twice during the last fiscal year to review internal and external accounting procedures and, among other things, to consider the selection of the independent registered public accountant for the Funds and the Master Funds, to approve all significant services proposed to be performed by the accountants, and to consider the possible effect of

- 22 -

such services on their independence. All of the members of the Audit Committee attended each meeting.

The Board of Trustees also has a standing Nominating Committee. All of the Independent Trustees are members of the Nominating Committee. The Nominating Committee is responsible for, among other things, recommending candidates to fill vacancies on the Board of Trustees. The Nominating Committee did not meet during the last fiscal year. The Nominating Committee will consider nominees recommended by shareholders. If you would like to recommend a nominee to the Nominating Committee, please deliver your recommendation in writing to the Secretary of the Domini Funds, 536 Broadway, 7^th Floor, New York, New York 10012.A copy of the Nominating Committee Charter is attached to this proxy statement as Exhibit A.

Indemnification

The Declaration of Trust for each of the Funds provides that it will indemnify its Trustees and officers (the “Indemnified Parties”) against liabilities and expenses incurred in connection with litigation in which they may be involved because of their offices with such Fund, unless, as to liability to such Fund or its shareholders, it is finally adjudicated that the Indemnified Parties engaged in willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence, or reckless disregard of the duties involved in their offices, or unless with respect to any other matter it is finally adjudicated that the Indemnified Parties did not act in good faith in the reasonable belief that their actions were in the best interests of the Fund. In case of settlement, such indemnification will not be provided unless it has been determined by a court or other body approving the settlement or other disposition, or by a reasonable determination, based upon a review of readily available facts, by vote of a majority of disinterested Trustees or in a written opinion of independent counsel, that such Indemnified Parties have not engaged in willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence, or reckless disregard of their duties.

Each Master Fund’s Declaration of Trust provides that it will indemnify the Trustees and officers in the same manner as described above for the Funds against liabilities and expenses incurred in

- 23 -

connection with litigation in which they may be involved because of their offices with such Master Fund.

Nomination by the Board of Trustees

At a meeting of the Board held on May 24, 2006, the Board, including the Independent Trustees, agreed that each Trustee of the Funds and Master Funds should be submitted to shareholders for approval and voted to nominate such Nominees and recommend election of the Nominees by the shareholders of the Funds.

Vote Required

Election of the nominees as Trustees of the Funds will require the vote of a plurality of the outstanding voting securities of the Funds, taken together, present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting.

Election of the nominees as Trustees of the Master Funds will require the vote of a plurality of the outstanding voting securities of the Master Funds, taken together, present in person or represented by proxy at a meeting of the investors in the Master Funds.

The Board of Trustees unanimously recommends that you vote FOR election of the nominees as Trustees of the Funds and the Master Funds.

- 24 -

This page intentionally left blank

- 25 -

Proposal 2.

To approve a new Management Agreement between the Domini Social Equity Trust and Domini Social Investments LLC.

Background

Shareholders of the Domini Social Equity Fund (the “Equity Fund”) are being asked to approve a new Management Agreement (the “New Management Agreement”) for the Domini Social Equity Trust (the “Master Equity Fund”).

The Equity Fund is a “feeder” fund within a structure known as a “master/feeder” mutual fund structure. Rather than invest directly in securities, the Equity Fund invests in a separate trust, or “master” trust, called the Domini Social Equity Trust (“the Master Equity Fund”) which acquires and manages a portfolio of securities and has the same investment objective as the Equity Fund. As an investor in the Master Equity Fund, the Equity Fund has been asked to approve the New Management Agreement. The Equity Fund is asking you to instruct it as to how to vote on this matter.

The Master Equity Fund currently seeks to provide its investors, including the Equity Fund, with a long-term total return that matches the performance of the Domini 400 Social Index^SM (the “Index”)¹ an index made up of the stocks of 400 companies selected using social and environmental standards. The Master Equity Fund seeks to achieve this objective by investing in the securities of the companies included in the Index in approximately the same proportion as they are found in the Index.

^1/ Domini 400 Social Index is a service mark of KLD Research & Analytics, Inc (“KLD”) and is used under license. KLD is the owner of the Domini 400 Social Index but is not the manager of the Equity Fund or the Master Equity Fund.

- 26 -

Because the Master Equity Fund currently uses a passive investment strategy, management cannot shift its portfolio concentration from one industry to another or from one stock to another, to enhance performance.

Domini, the manager of the Master Equity Fund, believes that shareholders would be better served by an active investment strategy.An active investment strategy would provide management with the flexibility to adjust the portfolio as market conditions change. The Fund will continue to seek to provide shareholders with long-term total return (see below for additional discussion of the proposed investment strategy).

At a meeting held on April 28, 2006, Domini recommended, and the Board approved, a change in the investment strategy of the Master Equity Fund from a passive to an active investment strategy. Related to the change to an active investment strategy, the Board also approved a change to the investment objective of each of the Equity Fund and the Master Equity Fund. Although the investment objective of long term total return will not change, each of the Equity Fund and the Master Equity Fund will no longer have the objective of long term total return that matches the Index.

Domini’s review of the long-term track record of the Master Equity Fund demonstrates that social and environmental analysis has led to strong individual stock selection.

Domini believes that social and environmental standards help to identify companies that are led by forward-looking management teams, with positive corporate cultures, and that these companies make better long-term investments.

Domini believes an active investment strategy will improve the Fund’s ability to capitalize on this stock selection advantage.

In connection with the new investment objective and the change to an active investment strategy, Domini recommended,and the Board approved, the termination of SSgA Funds Management, Inc. (‘SSgA”), the current submanager of the Master Equity Fund, and the appointment of Wellington Management as the submanager of the

- 27 -

Master Equity Fund, as fully discussed in Proposal 3 below. The Board’s approval of the new investment objective and strategy and the termination of the SSgA submanagement agreement is subject to shareholder approval of the New Management Agreement and the Submanagement Agreement with Wellington Management (as discussed in Proposal 3).

Actively managed funds tend to be more expensive to manage than passively managed funds. Domini has determined that, based on the fee schedule proposed by Wellington Management and the other expenses Domini expects to incur in changing to an active investment strategy, it is necessary for Domini to propose an increase in its management fee. Domini believes that the new strategy it is proposing will result in enhanced financial returns to shareholders and that the proposed expenses are fair and reasonable.Shareholders are being asked to approve the New Management Agreement due to this proposed increase in fees (See below for a more complete discussion of the proposed increase in fees).

Domini, a Massachusetts limited liability company, 536 Broadway, 7^th Floor, New York, New York 10012, currently manages the assets of the Master Equity Fund pursuant to a Management Agreement dated as of October 22, 1997 (the “Existing Management Agreement”). The Existing Management Agreement was last approved by the Board of Trustees on April 28, 2006 when the Trustees approved its continuation for an additional twelve month period. The Existing Management Agreement was most recently submitted to a vote of investors in the Master Equity Fund, including the Equity Fund, on October 21, 1997 in connection with its initial approval.

Change in Investment Strategy to Active Management

Domini believes that an active investment strategy will allow the Master Equity Fund to more effectively capitalize on the use of social and environmental standards to select investments. Domini’s review of the long-term track record of the Master Equity Fund demonstrates that social and environmental analysis has led to strong individual stock selection. Domini believes that social and environmental standards help to identify companies that are led by forward-looking management teams, with positive corporate cultures, and that these companies make better long-term investments. A

- 28 -

passive investment strategy, however, limits the Fund’s ability to capitalize on this stock selection advantage, because it requires that the Fund invest in all of the stocks in the Index, in exactly the same proportion as the Index.

Subject to Domini’s social and environmental standards, Wellington Management will seek to add value using a diversified quantitative stock selection approach, while managing risk through portfolio construction. Wellington Management will seek to invest in stocks it believes are undervalued by the market and whose technical and fundamental momentum attributes are attractive. This strategy is more fully described in Proposal 3 below. Domini believes that this new approach will generate positive financial returns to shareholders, while remaining consistent with the Equity Fund’s unwavering commitment to socially responsible investing.

Increase in Fees Paid to Domini

Actively managed funds tend to be more expensive to manage than passively managed funds. Because of the increase in submanagement fees proposed by Wellington Management and the additional expenses that Domini expects to incur in connection with the social and environmental analysis it will perform for the Fund, Domini has determined it is necessary to increase the management fees it charges to the Master Equity Fund.

If the investors in the Master Equity Fund approve the New Management Agreement and the Submanagement Agreement with Wellington Management is approved, Domini will be entitled to receive fees of 0.30% of the first $2 billion of net assets managed, 0.29% of the next $1 billion of net assets managed and 0.28% of net assets managed in excess of $3 billion for providing investment advisory services to the Master Equity Fund. Under the Existing Management Agreement, Domini is entitled to receive fees of 0.20% of the first $2 billion of net assets managed, 0.19% of the next $500 million of net assets managed and 0.18% of net assets managed in excess of $2.5 billion for providing

- 29 -

investment advisory services to the Master Equity Fund. Because the Equity Fund is one of four investors in the Master Equity Fund, its shareholders will bear a portion of the increase in the management fees.

Pursuant to a Sponsorship Agreement with respect to the Equity Fund, Domini provides the Equity Fund with oversight, administrative, and management services. Domini’s fee for administrative and sponsorship services with respect to the Equity Fund is currently 0.50% of the average daily net assets of each class of the Fund. Domini is currently waiving sponsorship fees such that the Equity Fund is currently paying 0.42% of the average daily net assets of each class of the Fund. For the fiscal year ended July 31, 2005, the Equity Fund incurred $4,950,221 in sponsorship fees (after fee waivers and expense reimbursements). Domini will continue to provide these services to the Equity Fund if the New Management Agreement and the Submanagement Agreement with Wellington Management are approved. If the New Management Agreement and the Submanagement Agreement with Wellington Management are approved, the Equity Fund will, as of November 30, 2006, pay sponsorship fees to Domini in the amount of 0.45% of the first $2 billion of net assets of each class of the Fund, 0.44% of the next $1 billion of net assets of each class of the Fund, and 0.43% of net assets of each class of the Fund in excess of $3 billion.

- 30 -

Actual ManagementFeepaid by theMaster EquityFund for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2005*		Estimated Amount theMaster Equity Fund would have Paid if the Proposed Management Fee under the New Management Agreement had been in Effect	Percentage Increase
$3,165,651		$4,748,476	50%


Equity Fund’s Portion of the Actual ManagementFeePaidfor the fiscal year ended July 31, 2005*		EstimatedEquity FundPortion of the Proposed Management Fee if the New Management Agreement had been in Effect	Percentage Increase
$2,357,248		$3,535,872	50%


Actual Sponsorship Fee paid by theEquity Fund for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2005*		Estimated Amount theEquity Fund would have Paid if the Proposed Sponsorship Fee under the New Sponsorship Agreement had been in Effect	Percentage Increase
$4,950,221		$5,303,808	7%


Total Management and Sponsorship Fees Paid by theEquity Fund for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2005*		Estimated Total Management and Sponsorship Fees theEquity Fundwould have Paid if the New Agreements had been in effect	Percentage Increase
$7,307,469		$8,839,680	21%
	*After giving effect to fees waived.

- 31 -

Contractual Expense Cap for the

Domini Social Equity Fund

The proposed increase in the management fees paid by the Master Equity Fund will be borne by investors in the Master Equity Fund, including the Equity Fund and its shareholders. However, if the New Management Agreement and the Submanagement Agreement with Wellington Management are approved, Domini will contractually agree to:

(1) lower the sponsorship fees payable by each class of shares of the Equity Fund from 0.50% of net assets to 0.45% of the first $2 billion of net assets, 0.44% of the next $1 billion of net assets, and 0.43% of net assets in excess of $3 billion; and

(2) cap the total expenses payable by each class of shares of the Equity Fund to the total expense ratios listed below for the fiscal year ending November 30, 2007, subject to annual renewal.

Remainder of this page intentionally left blank

- 32 -

Effect of the Increase in Management Fees

To assist shareholders of the Equity Fund in understanding the effect of the proposed increase in management fees on the expense of investing in shares of the Equity Fund, the following table summarizes the expenses incurred by the Equity Fund for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2005 and also restates these expenses to show what the expenses would have been had the proposed fees been in effect during the same period.*

	Investor Shares		Class R Shares
	Current	Proposed	Current	Proposed
Shareholder Fees
(fees paid directly by you)
Sales Charge (Load) Imposed on Purchases	None	None	None	None
Deferred Sales Charge (Load)	None	None	None	None
Redemption Fee*** (as a percentage of amount redeemed, if applicable)	2.00%**	2.00%**	2.00%**	2.00%**
Exchange Fee	None	None	None	None

Annual Fund Operating Expenses
(expenses deducted from the Fund’s assets)
Management Fees	0.20%	0.30%	0.20%	0.30%
Distribution (12b-1) Fees	0.25%	0.25%	None	None
Other Expenses
Administrative Services and Sponsorship Fee	0.50%	0.45%	0.50%	0.45%
Other Expenses	0.18%	0.19%	0.04%	0.14%
Total Annual Fund Operating Expenses	1.13%	1.19%	0.74%	0.89%
Fee Waiver	(0.18)⁺%	(0.04)%‡	(0.11)⁺%	(0.04)%‡
Net Expenses	0.95%	1.15%	0.63%	0.85%

* The table and the following example reflect the aggregate expenses of the Equity Fund and the Master Equity Fund.

** In order to discourage use of the Equity Fund for market timing, an early redemption fee is charged on sales or exchanges of shares made less than 60 days after settlement of purchase or acquisition through exchange, with certain exceptions.

- 33 -

*** If you wish to receive your redemption proceeds by bank wire, there is a $10 wire service fee. For additional information, please refer to the Funds’ shareholder manual.

⁺Until November 30, 2006, Domini has contractually agreed to waive certain fees and/or reimburse certain expenses, including management fees, so that the Equity Fund’s expenses, net of waivers and reimbursements, will not exceed, on a per annum basis, 0.95% of the average daily net assets representing Investor shares and 0.63% of the average daily net assets representing Class R shares, absent an earlier modification by the Board of Trustees.

‡ If the proposed new Management Agreement is approved and becomes effective, Domini has contractually agreed to to waive certain fees and/or reimburse certain expenses at least until November 30, 2007, including management fees, so that the Equity Fund’s expenses, net of waivers and reimbursements, will not exceed, on a per annum basis, 1.15% of the average daily net assets representing Investor shares and 0.85% of the average daily net assets representing Class R shares, absent an earlier modification by the Board of Trustees.

The example below is intended to help you compare the cost of investing in each class of shares of the Equity Fund with the costs of investing in those classes after giving effect to the proposed increase in fees. It illustrates the hypothetical expenses that you would incur if you invest $10,000 in the Equity Fund for the time periods indicated and then sell all of your shares at the end of each period. This example assumes that the Fund provides a return of 5% a year, all dividends and distributions are reinvested, operating expenses remain the same for the time period indicated, and the fee waiver reflected in the fee table is in effect for the one-year time period. Although your actual costs may be higher or lower, based on these assumptions your costs would be as follows:

Share Class	1 Year	3 Years	5 Years	10 Years
Investor shares
Current	$97*	$341	$605	$1,359
Proposed	$117*	$374	$650	$1,440
Class R Shares
Current	$64*	$226	$401	$908
Proposed	$87*	$280	$489	$1,092

*For redemptions less than 60 days after settlement of purchase or acquisition through exchange, the cost of investing could be up to $325

- 34 -

higher for the Investor shares and $295 higher for the R Shares, due to the early redemption fee. For additional information, please refer to your shareholder manual.

This example should not be considered to represent actual expenses or performance for the past or the future. Actual future expenses may be higher or lower than those shown.

If the New Management Agreement and the Submanagement Agreement with Wellington Management are approved, the expenses you will incur as a shareholder of the Equity Fund will increase. However, Domini believes that the new strategy it is proposing will result in enhanced financial returns to shareholders and that the proposed expenses are fair and reasonable.

Terms of the New Management Agreement

Other than the proposed increase in management fees, the New Management Agreement is the same as the Existing Management Agreement. A description of the terms of the Existing Management Agreement and the New Management Agreement (collectively, the “Management Agreements”) follows.

Please refer toExhibit Battached to this proxy statement for the complete New Management Agreement. The description of the New Management Agreement in this proxy statement is qualified in its entirety by the provisions of the New Management Agreement attached asExhibitB.

The New Management Agreement provides that Domini shall manage the assets of the Master Equity Fund and provide certain administrative services to the Master Equity Fund. Domini will have authority to determine from time to time what securities are purchased, sold or exchanged, and what portion of assets of the Master Equity Fund is held uninvested. Domini will also perform such administrative and management tasks for the Master Equity Fund as may from time to time be reasonably requested, including:

(a) maintaining office facilities and furnishing clerical services necessary for maintaining the organization of the

- 35 -

Master Equity Fund and for performing administrative and management functions;

(b) supervising the overall administration of the Master Equity Fund, including negotiation of contracts and fees with, and monitoring of performance and billings of, the transfer agent, shareholder servicing agents, custodian, and other independent contractors or agents of the Master Equity Fund;

(c) overseeing (with the advice of the counsel to the Master Equity Fund) the preparation of and, if applicable, the filing of all documents required for compliance by the Master Equity Fund with applicable laws and regulations, including registration statements, prospectuses and statements of additional information, semi-annual and annual reports to shareholders, proxy statements, and tax returns;

(d) preparing agendas and supporting documents for, and minutes of meetings of, the Trustees, committees of the Trustees, and shareholders;

(e) arranging for maintenance of the books and records of the Master Equity Fund;

(f) maintaining telephone coverage to respond to investor and shareholder inquiries; and

(g) answering questions from the general public, the media, and investors in the Master Equity Fund regarding the securities holdings of the Master Equity Fund, limits on investment, and the Master Equity Fund’s proxy voting and shareholder activism policies and practices.

Domini provides persons satisfactory to the Board of Trustees of the Master Equity Fund to serve as officers of the Master Equity Fund. Such officers, as well as certain other employees and Trustees of the Master Equity Fund, may be directors, officers, or employees of Domini or its affiliates. Domini furnishes at its own expense all facilities and personnel necessary in connection with providing these services.

- 36 -

The New Management Agreement provides that Domini may render services to others. Domini may employ, at its own expense, or may request that the Master Equity Fund, employ (subject to the requirements of the 1940 Act) one or more subadvisers or submanagers, subject to Domini’s supervision. The Management Agreement is terminable without penalty on not more than 60 days’ nor less than 30 days’ written notice by the Master Equity Fund, when authorized either by majority vote of the outstanding voting securities of the Master Equity Fund (with the vote of each investor in the Master Equity Fund being in proportion to the amount of its investment), or by a vote of a majority of the Board of Trustees of the Master Equity Fund, or by Domini, and will automatically terminate in the event of its assignment. The New Management Agreement provides that neither Domini nor its personnel shall be liable for any error of judgment or mistake of law or for any loss arising out of any investment or for any act or omission in its services to the Master Equity Fund, except for willful misfeasance, bad faith, or gross negligence or reckless disregard of its or their obligations and duties under the New Management Agreement.

If the New Management Agreement is approved by the vote of the holders of a “majority of the outstanding voting securities” (as defined under the heading “Vote Required” below) of the Master Equity Fund and the Submanagement Agreement with Wellington Management is approved as provided in Proposal 3, the New Management Agreement will become effective on November 30, 2006 and continue in effect until November 30, 2008, and thereafter will continue in effect if such continuance is specifically approved at least annually by the Board of Trustees or by a majority of the outstanding voting securities of the Master Equity Fund at a meeting called for the purpose of voting on the New Management Agreement (with the vote of each investor in the Master Equity Fund being in proportion to the amount of its investment), and, in either case, by a majority of the Trustees who are not parties to the New Management Agreement or interested persons of any such party at a meeting called for the purpose of voting on the New Management Agreement.

- 37 -

Information Regarding Domini

Domini Social Investments LLC (“Domini”) is a Massachusetts limited liability company with principal offices at 536 Broadway, 7th floor, New York, New York 10012. Amy Domini is the Manager of Domini. Each of Ms. Domini and Domini Holdings Corporation, LLC holds more than ten percent of the outstanding units of Domini. Ms. Domini is the Manager of Domini Holdings, LLC.

Domini Social Investments LLC currently serves as the manager of the Master Equity Fund. Domini has been managing money since November 1997. As of September 30, 2005, Domini managed more than $1.8 billion in assets for investors who are working to create positive change in society by using social and environmental standards in their investment decisions. Domini provides the Domini Funds with investment supervisory services, overall operational support, and administrative services.

Management and Governance.Listed below are the names, positions and principal occupations of the officers of Domini as of March 31, 2006. The principal business address of all of the officers is at the offices of Domini, 536 Broadway, 7th floor, New York, New York 10012. Each officer of Domini is also a Trustee or officer of the Domini Funds, as noted below:

Name

Capacity with Domini

Capacity with the Domini Funds

Other Principal Occupation

Amy L. Domini

Chief Executive Officer

Chair, Trustee and President of the Domini Funds

Private Trustee, Loring, Wolcott & Coolidge Office (fiduciary); Manager, DSIL Investment Services, LLC (broker-dealer); Manager, Domini Holdings LLC (holding company)

- 38 -

Carole M. Laible

President and Chief Operating Officer

Treasurer of the Domini Funds

President, CEO, Chief Compliance Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, and Treasurer, DSIL Investment Services LLC (broker- dealer)

Steven D. Lydenberg

Chief Investment Officer

Vice President of the Domini Funds

N/A

Maurizio Tallini

Chief Compliance Officer

Chief Compliance Officer of the Domini Funds

N/A

Information Regarding Other Funds Managed by Domini with a Similar Investment Objective to the Domini Social Equity Trust

In addition to serving as manager of the Domini Social Equity Trust, Domini serves as the manager of the Domini European Social Equity Fund (the “European Equity Fund”), the Domini European Social Equity Portfolio (the “European Equity Portfolio”) and the Domini European Social Equity Trust (the “Master European Fund”), the underlying fund in which each of the European Equity Fund and the European Equity Portfolio invests. Each of the European Equity Fund, the European Equity Portfolio and Master European Fund has a similar investment objective as the Master Equity Fund. The following table contains information about assets and compensation paid by the European Equity Fund* and the European Equity Portfolio** as of June 1, 2006.

Fund

Net Assets Managed by Domini

Annual Rate of Compensation Received by Domini as a Percentage of Average Daily Net Assets

European Equity Fund*

$48,256,667.87

1.00%

European Equity Portfolio**

$372,142.55

1.00%

* The fees reflect the aggregate fees of the European Equity Fund and the Master European Fund, the underlying fund in which the European Equity Fund invests. Domini’s fee for advisory services to the Master European

- 39 -

Fund is 0.75% of the average daily net assets of the Master European Fund. Domini’s fee for services to the European Equity Fund is 1.00% of the average daily net assets of the European Equity Fundminus the aggregate management fee allocated to the European Equity Fund by the Master European Fund. Currently, Domini is reducing its fee to the extent necessary to keep the aggregate operating expenses of the European Equity Fund (including the European Equity Fund’s share of the Master European Fund’s expenses but excluding brokerage fees and commissions, interest, taxes and extraordinary expenses), net of waivers and reimbursements, at no greater than 1.60% of the average daily net assets of the shares of the European Equity Fund.

** The fees reflect the aggregate fees of the European Equity Portfolio and the Master European Fund, the underlying fund in which the European Equity Portfolio invests. Domini’s fee for advisory services to the Master European Fund is 0.75% of the average daily net assets of the Master European Fund. Domini’s fee for services to the European Equity Portfolio is 1.00% of the average daily net assets of the European Equity Portfoliominus the aggregate management fee allocated to the European Equity Portfolio by the Master European Fund. Currently, Domini is reducing its fee to the extent necessary to keep the aggregate operating expenses of the European Equity Portfolio (including the European Equity Portfolio’s share of the Master European Fund’s expenses but excluding brokerage fees and commissions, interest, taxes and extraordinary expenses), net of waivers and reimbursements, at no greater than 1.60% of the average daily net assets of the shares of the European Equity Portfolio.

Other Services Provided to the Domini Social Equity Fund

and the Domini Social Equity Trust

- 40 -

sponsorship fees to Domini in the amount of 0.45% of the first $2 billion of net assets of each class of the Fund, 0.44% of the next $1 billion of net assets of each class of the Fund, and 0.43% of net assets of each class of the Fund in excess of $3 billion.

DSIL Investment Services LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Domini, is the distributor of the Equity Fund’s shares. The Equity Fund has adopted a Rule 12b-1 plan with respect to its Investor shares that allows the Fund to pay its distributor on an annual basis for the sale and distribution of the Investor shares and for services provided to shareholders. These annual distribution and service fees may equal up to 0.25% of the average daily net assets of the Equity Fund’s Investor shares. For the fiscal year ended July 31, 2005, Investor shares of the Equity Fund accrued $3,228,455 in distribution fees. The distributor waived fees totaling $625,621. The Equity Fund does not pay any distribution and service fees with respect to the Class R shares. DSIL Investment Services LLC also serves as the placement agent for the Master Equity Fund. The Master Equity Fund does not pay any fees to DSIL Investment Services LLC for acting as placement agent. DSIL Investment Services LLC will continue to provide these services to the Equity Fund and the Master Equity Fund if the New Management Agreement and the Submanagement Agreement with Wellington Management are approved.

Portfolio Transactions and Tax Implications

For the fiscal year ended July 31, 2005, brokerage transactions were not placed with any person affiliated with the Master Equity Fund, the Equity Fund, Domini, Wellington Management, SSgA, DSIL Investment Services LLC, PFPC Inc. (the Funds’ transfer agent) or Investors Bank & Trust Company (the Funds’ custodian).

The transition from a passive to an active strategy will require the sale of many stocks currently held by the Master Equity Fund. These sales could result in capital gain distributions to Fund shareholders. Management will attempt to efficiently manage any tax implications in connection with the transition of the Master Equity Fund’s portfolio of securities. It is expected that the portfolio transition period, under normal market conditions, would be approximately 60 days. Because the new strategy is

- 41 -

proposed to go into effect on or about November 30, 2006, any resulting tax impact on shareholders would occur over two calendar years (rather than one) if the portfolio is transitioned over 60 days, as expected.

Factors Considered by the Board of Trustees

At a meeting held on April 28, 2006, the Board of Trustees considered the approval of the New Management Agreement. In advance of the meeting, the Independent Trustees submitted to Domini a written request for information in connection with their consideration of the New Management Agreement. The Trustees received, reviewed and considered, among other things:

(i) a report based on information provided by Strategic Insight that compared both the current and proposed fees and expenses of each of the Master Equity Fund and the Equity Fund (before and after giving effect to current and proposed fee waivers) to those of various peer groups including, without limitation, peer groups of socially responsible funds, actively managed U.S. equity funds, and U.S. equity index funds;

(ii) a report from Domini regarding the proposed investment strategies and techniques for the Master Equity Fund, including Domini’s rationale for changing the investment objective and strategies of the Master Equity Fund and the Equity Fund, and a discussion of the risks of the proposed strategy;

(iii) a report from Domini that compared the performance of the Domini 400 Social Index to the performance of the S&P 500 Index (the benchmark of the Master Equity Fund) over various periods and that included an attribution analysis that showed the impact of the Domini 400 Social Index being underweighted in certain industries and sectors relative to the S&P 500; and

(iv) reports from and presentations by Domini that described (a) the nature, extent and quality of the services proposed to be provided by Domini to each of the Master Equity Fund and the Equity Fund in connection with the implementation of the new investment strategy, (b) the fees and other amounts

- 42 -

proposed to be paid to Domini under the New Management Agreement, including information as to the fees charged and services provided to other clients, (c) certain information about Domini’s compliance program and procedures and any regulatory issues, (d) brokerage practices, including soft dollar practices, and (e) Domini’s proxy voting policies and procedures.

The Trustees, including all of the Independent Trustees, concluded that Domini had the capabilities, resources, and personnel necessary to manage the Master Equity Fund and implement the new investment strategy and that Domini had the capabilities, resources, and personnel necessary to continue to manage and provide administrative services to the Equity Fund. The Board further concluded that, based on the services to be provided by Domini to the Master Equity Fund pursuant to the New Management Agreement, the fees paid by similar funds and taking into account the agreed-upon fee waivers and such other matters as the Trustees considered relevant in the exercise of their reasonable judgment, the compensation proposed to be paid to Domini under the New Management Agreement is fair and reasonable.

In reaching their determination to approve the New Management Agreement, the Trustees considered a variety of factors they believed relevant and balanced a number of considerations. In their deliberations, the Trustees did not identify any particular information or factor that was all-important or controlling. The primary factors and the conclusions are described below.

Nature, Quality, and Extent of Services Provided

The Trustees considered that the New Managment Agreement was the same as the Existing Management Agreement except for the increase in fees payable to Domini. The Trustees considered that, pursuant to the New Management Agreement, Domini, subject to the direction of the Board, will continue to be responsible for providing advice and guidance with respect to the Master Equity Fund and for managing the investment of the assets of the Master Equity Fund, which it will do by engaging with, and overseeing the activities of, Wellington Management. It was noted

- 43 -

that Domini will apply its social and environmental standards to a universe of securities provided by Wellington Management and that Wellington Management will provide the day-to-day portfolio management of the Master Equity Fund, including making purchases and sales of securities consistent with its investment objective and policies, including Domini’s social and environmental standards.

The Trustees considered the scope of the services to be provided by Domini under the New Management Agreement and the quality of services provided by Domini to the other Domini Funds. They considered the professional experience, tenure, and qualifications of the portfolio management teams proposed for the Master Equity Fund and the other senior personnel at Domini. They also considered Domini’s capabilities and experience in the development and application of social and environmental investment standards and its reputation and leadership in the socially responsible investment community. They noted that the senior members of Domini's research team had years of experience in the development and application of social and environmental investment standards. In addition, they considered Domini’s compliance policies and procedures and compliance record.

The Trustees noted that Domini will also continue to administer the Master Equity Fund ‘s business and other affairs pursuant to the New Management Agreement. It was noted that, among other things, Domini will continue to provide the Master Equity Fund with office space, administrative services and personnel as are necessary for operations. The Trustees considered the quality of the administrative services Domini had provided to the Master Equity Fund in the past, as well as the quality of adminsitrative services Domini provided to the other Domini Funds, including Domini’s role in coordinating the activities of service providers. They noted that they were satisfied with the quality of the advisory and administrative services provided by Domini to the Master Equity Fund and the other Domini Funds, particularly Domini's oversight of submanagers and development and application of social and environmental investment standards.

Based on the foregoing, the Trustees concluded that they were satisfied with the nature, quality and extent of services to be

- 44 -

provided by Domini to the Master Equity Fund under the New Management Agreement.

Performance Information

The Trustees considered the performance of the Equity Fund compared to its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index, and noted that the annualized total return of the Equity Fund had lagged annualized total return of the S&P 500 Index for the 1, 3, 5 and 10 year periods ending March 31, 2006 and since the Fund’s inception. The Trustees considered information provided to them that showed that stock selection had generally helped the performance of the Fund compared to the S&P 500 Index over most time periods but that the underweight versus the S&P 500 Index of certain industries and sectors had hurt the Fund’s performance compared to the benchmark. The Trustees noted that, as an index fund that invests in the securities of the companies in the Domini 400 Social Index, the Master Equity Fund does not buy and sell securities based on market conditions or an evaluation by management of particular securities. They considered how the passive investment strategy used by the Master Equity Fund had impacted the performance of the Master Equity Fund.

Fees and Other Expenses

The Trustees considered the increased management fees to be paid by the Master Equity Fund to Domini under the New Management Agreement.

The Trustees noted that Domini (and not the Master Equity Fund) will pay Wellington Management from its advisory fee for the Master Equity Fund. The Trustees also considered information that showed the net increase in fees that Domini would receive (after taking into account that Domini would pay the submanagement fees and that Domini had proposed to reimburse or waive fees for the Equity Fund and the other feeder funds) and the expenses that Domini expected to incur in connection with providing the social and environmental screening for the Master Equity Fund. The Trustees compared the level of the Master Equity Fund’s advisory and administrative fees to the comparative fees of the peer groups described above, as well as the expected

- 45 -

total expense ratio of the Equity Fund compared to those peers. In addition, the Trustees also reviewed the management fees that Domini charges its other fund clients with investment objectives similar to the investment objective of the Master Equity Fund and noted that the fees charged to such other clients were higher than the fees proposed to be charged to the Master Equity Fund and the portion of the proposed management fee and sponsorship fee to be paid by the Equity Fund.

The Trustees also reviewed the fees under the Existing Management Agreement and considered that the current total expense ratio for the Equity Fund exceeded the peer group average total expense ratio for U.S. equity index funds even after giving effect to the waiver by Domini of certain fees and expenses. The Trustees considered the reasons that the total expense ratio of the Fund exceeded that of the U.S. equity index funds peer group and noted that, given the license, submanagement and other fees paid or reimbursed by Domini, a reduction of fees was not likely to be a feasible alternative.

The Trustees then considered that, based on the information provided by Strategic Insight, the proposed new management fee for the Master Equity Fund was lower than the average management fees of various peer groups. Because the average management fees for the peer groups included fees for administrative services, the Trustees also compared the proposed management and sponsorship fees payable by the Equity Fund to the average management fees of the various peer groups. The Board considered that the sum of the Equity Fund's portion of the proposed management fee and its sponsorship fee was about equal to or less than those average management fees. The Trustees also considered that the expected total expense ratio of the Equity Fund, for both the Investor shares and the R shares, after giving effect to the New Management Agreement, would be lower than the average of the total expense ratios of its most relevant peer group.

Costs of Services Provided and Profitability

The Trustees reviewed information provided to them by Domini concerning the costs borne by and profitability of Domini with respect to its advisory and administrative relationship with

- 46 -

the Equity Fund for the 2005 calendar year, along with a description of the methodology used by Domini in preparing the profitability information. They also reviewed information provided to them by Domini that showed the net dollar increase in fees that Domini expected to receive under the New Management Agreement and reviewed the increased expenses that Domini expected to incur in providing services under the New Management Agreement.

Based on the foregoing, the Trustees concluded that they were satisfied that Domini's expected level of profitability with respect to the New Management Agreement was reasonable in view of the nature, quality and extent of services to be provided.

Other Benefits

The Trustees considered the other benefits that Domini and its affiliates received and could be expected to receive from their relationship with the Master Equity Fund.

The Trustees reviewed the character and amount of payments that will continue to be received by Domini and its affiliates, other than with respect to the management arrangements, in connection with its relationship to the Master Equity Fund. They considered that DSIL Investment Services, LLC, a subsidiary of Domini, will continue to receive 12b-1 fees from the Equity Fund and will retain those fees in certain circumstances. In addition, the Trustees considered the intangible benefits that would continue to accrue to Domini and its affiliates by virtue of their relationship with the Master Equity Fund and the Equity Fund and how implementation of the new strategy would likely increase those benefits.

The Trustees concluded that the benefits expected to be received by Domini and its affiliates, as outlined above, were reasonable in the context of the relationship between Domini and the Master Equity Fund and the Equity Fund and supported the approval of the Management Agreement.

Economies of Scale

- 47 -

The Trustees also considered whether economies of scale would be realized by Domini as the Master Equity Fund and the Equity Fund got larger and the extent to which economies of scale were reflected in the proposed new fee schedules. The Trustees noted that breakpoints were being proposed for both the New Management Agreement and the sponsorship agreements for the Equity Fund, and also considered the fee waivers proposed by Domini. They concluded that, given these breakpoints, the shareholders would share in the economies of scale as each of the Master Equity Fund and the Equity Fund got larger and that this was a positive factor in support of approval of the Management Agreement.

Conclusion

Based upon its review, the Board of Trustees concluded the following:

The terms of the New Management Agreement are reasonable, fair, and in the best interests of the Master Equity Fund and its investors, including the Equity Fund

and

The fees provided in the New Management Agreement are fair and reasonable in light of the usual and customary charges made for services of the same nature and quality.

Accordingly, the Board of Trustees unanimously approved the New Management Agreement and voted to recommend that shareholders vote in favor of the New Management Agreement. If the New Management Agreement is approved by the investors in the Master Equity Fund and the Submanagement Agreement with Wellington Management is approved as provided in Proposal 3, the New Management Agreement will go into effect on November 30, 2006.

- 48 -

Vote Required

Approval of the New Management Agreement will require the approval of “a majority of the outstanding voting securities” (as defined in the 1940 Act) of the Master Equity Fund, which means the affirmative vote by the lesser of (a) 67% or more of the shares of the Master Equity Fund present at the meeting, if more than 50% of the outstanding shares of the Master Equity Fund are represented at that meeting in person or by proxy or (b) more than 50% of the outstanding shares of the Master Equity Fund.

The New Management Agreement will not go into effect unless the Submanagement Agreement with Wellington Management described in Proposal 3 is also approved by the investors in the Master Equity Fund. In the event that the New Management Agreement or the Submanagement Agreement with Wellington Management do not receive the requisite approvals, Domini will continue to serve as the Master Equity Fund’s manager under the Existing Management Agreement, and Domini will either continue its relationship with SSgA, negotiate a new submanagement agreement with ~~Seix Advisors~~a different investment advisory organization, or make other appropriate arrangements, in either event subject to approval in accordance with the 1940 Act.

The Board of Trustees unanimously recommends that you vote FOR the approval of the New Management Agreement.

- 49 -

Proposal 3.

To approve a Submanagement Agreement for the Domini Social Equity Trust between Wellington Management Company, LLP and Domini Social Investments LLC.

As discussed in Proposal 2, Domini recommended, and the Board of Trustees approved, a change in the investment strategy of the Master Equity Fund from a passive to an active investment strategy and corresponding changes in each of the Equity Fund’s and the Master Equity Fund’s investment objective.

In connection with these changes, the Board of Trustees has authorized Domini to enter into a new Submanagement Agreement (the “New Submanagement Agreement”) with Wellington Management, subject to shareholder approval. In accordance with the requirements of the 1940 Act, the New Submanagement

Domini will maintain exclusive control over the application of its social and environmental standards to the Fund’s portfolio.

As of April 30, 2006, Wellington Management managed approximately $550 billion in assets. Wellington Management is the submanager of the Domini European Social Equity Fund.

The Board of Trustees carefully reviewed Wellington Management’s capabilities and track record and unanimously approved its selection. Domini and the Board believe that Wellington Management will be able to provide the Fund with strong, long-term service.

Agreement must be approved by the investors in the Master Equity Fund, including the Equity Fund. As a shareholder of the Equity Fund, the Equity Fund is asking you how to vote on this matter. If this proposal and the New Management Agreement are approved, the New Submanagement Agreement with Wellington Management will go into effect on November 30, 2006.

- 50 -

Change in Investment Strategy to Active Management

Domini and Wellington Management have developed a strategy that is designed to combine the strength of Domini’s social and environmental standards with Wellington Management’s quantitative analysis. Domini believes that this new approach will generate positive financial returns to shareholders, while remaining consistent with the Master Equity Fund’s unwavering commitment to socially responsible investing.

As submanager for the Master Equity Fund, Wellington Management will employ an active management strategy seeking to provide shareholders with long-term total return by invesing primarily in stocks of U.S. companies that Domini has determined meet the Fund’s social and environmental standards.

Subject to Domini’s social and enviromental standards, Wellington Management will seek to add value using a diversified quantitative stock selection approach, while managing risk through portfolio construction. Using a proprietary quantitative model, Wellington Management will rank securities according to value and momentum characteristics and will seek to invest in those stocks that it believes are undervalued by the market and whose fundamental and technical momentum attributes are attractive. Wellington Management will also use optimization techniques designed to reduce industry and sector biases.

Domini will maintain exclusive control over the application of its social and environmental standards to the Master Equity Fund’s portfolio.

In connection with the change to an active investment strategy, the Board of Trustees has voted to terminate the Submanagement Agreement, dated as of May 1, 2001 (the “Existing

- 51 -

Submanagement Agreement”), between Domini and SSgA Funds Management, Inc., (“SSgA”), subject to shareholder approval of the New Submanagement Agreement and the New Management Agreement. SSgA has served as the submanager of the Master Equity Fund since May 1, 2001. State Street Global Advisers, an affiliate of SSgA, served as the submanager of the Master Equity Fund from January 1, 2001 through April 30, 2001. SSgA is a subsidiary of State Street Corporation (“State Street”), a publicly held bank holding company, whose primary operating subsidiary is State Street Bank and Trust Company, a Massachusetts bank. SSgA is located at Two International Place, Boston, Massachusetts 02110. State Street’s principal address is 225 Franklin Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02110. The Existing Submanagement Agreement was last approved by the Board on April 28, 2006. The Existing Submanagement Agreement was approved by the investors in the Master Equity Fund on May 14, 2001 in connection with the replacement of State Street Global Advisers by SSgA due to a corporate restructuring.

Information Regarding Wellington Management

Wellington Management is a Massachusetts limited liability partnership with principal offices at 75 State Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02109. Wellington Management has provided investment advisory services for over 70 years. As of April 30, 2006, Wellington Management had approximately $550 billion in assets under management, and as of March 31, 2006, had approximately $24.2 billion in assets under management that were subject to social or environmental standards. Wellington Management is the submanager of the Domini European Social Equity Trust.

Management and Governance. Listed below are the names, positions, and principal occupations of the members of the Executive Committee and the principal executive officers of Wellington Management as of March 31, 2006. The principal business address of all members of the Executive Committee and all principal executive officers is at the offices of Wellington Management, 75 State Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02109.

- 52 -

Name	Position with Wellington Management LLP	Other Principal Occupation
Nicholas C. Adams	Senior Vice President, Partner and Executive Committee Member	N/A
Paul Braverman	Senior Vice President, Partner and Chief Financial Officer	N/A
Cynthia M. Clarke	Senior Vice President, Partner and General Counsel	N/A
Laurie A. Gabriel	Senior Vice President, Managing Partner and Executive Committee Member	N/A
Paul J. Hamel	Senior Vice President, Partner and Executive Committee Member	N/A
James P. Hoffmann	Senior Vice President, Partner and Executive Committee Member	N/A
Selwyn J. Notelovitz	Vice President and Chief Compliance Officer	N/A
Saul J. Pannell	Senior Vice President, Partner and Executive Committee Member	N/A
Thomas L. Pappas	Senior Vice President, Partner and Executive Committee Member	N/A
Phillip H. Perelmuter	Senior Vice President, Partner and Executive Committee Member	N/A
John R. Ryan	Senior Vice President, Managing Partner and Executive Committee Member	N/A
Perry M. Traquina	President, CEO, Managing Partner, and Executive Committee Member	N/A

No officer or Trustee of the Domini Funds currently is an officer or employee of Wellington Management, or a member of Wellington Management’s Executive Committee. No officer or Trustee of the Domini Funds has any other material direct or indirect interest in the proposal to approve the New Submanagement Agreement or in Wellington Management, or any other person controlling, controlled

- 53 -

by, or under common control with Wellington Management. Since August 1, 2005, none of the officers or Trustees of the Domini Funds has had any material interest, direct or indirect, in any material transactions, or in any material proposed transactions, to which Wellington Management was or is to be a party.

Wellington Management acts as the investment subadviser for certain other mutual funds that have a similar investment objective to the Master Equity Fund as listed onExhibit C attached hereto. Information concerning the net assets of those mutual funds and the fees paid to Wellington Management for its services to those mutual funds is also provided onExhibitC. All information contained in this Proxy Statement about Wellington Management has been provided by Wellington Management.

Comparison of the New Submanagement Agreement and the Existing Submanagement Agreement

The terms and conditions of the New Submanagement Agreement, and their differences from the terms of the Existing Submanagement Agreement, are discussed below. Please refer toExhibit D attached to this proxy statement for the complete New Submanagement Agreement. The description of the New Submanagement Agreement in this proxy statement is qualified in its entirety by the provisions of the New Submanagement Agreement attached asExhibitD.

Under the New Submanagement Agreement, as under the Existing Submanagement Agreement, the submanager will furnish continuously an investment program and shall determine from time to time what securities shall be purchased, sold or exchanged and what portion of the assets of the Master Equity Fund shall be held uninvested, subject always to the provisions of the 1940 Act and to the investment objectives, policies, procedures, and restrictions imposed by the Master Equity Fund’s then current Registration Statement under the 1940 Act and the Declaration of Trust and By-Laws of the Domini Social Trust. Wellington Management shall furnish at its own expense all necessary services, facilities and personnel in connection with its responsibilities.

- 54 -

Like the Existing Submanagement Agreement, the New Submanagement Agreement provides that the submanager will not be liable for any error of judgment or mistake of law, for any loss arising out of any investment, or for any act or omission in the execution of securities transactions for the Master Equity Fund, except for willful misfeasance, bad faith, or gross negligence in the performance of its duties, or by reason of reckless disregard of its obligations under the New Submanagement Agreement.

If the New Management Agreement is approved as described under Proposal 2 and the New Submanagement Agreement is approved by the vote of the holders of a “majority of the outstanding voting securities” (as defined under the heading “Vote Required” below) of the Master Equity Fund, the New Submanagement Agreement will become effective on November 30, 2006 and continue in effect until November 30, 2008, and thereafter will continue in effect if such continuance is specifically approved at least annually by the Board of Trustees or by a majority of the outstanding voting securities of the Master Equity Fund at a meeting called for the purpose of voting on the New Submanagement Agreement (with the vote of each investor in the Master Equity Fund being in proportion to the amount of its investment), and, in either case, by a majority of the Trustees who are not parties to the New Submanagement Agreement or interested persons of any such party at a meeting called for the purpose of voting on the New Submanagement Agreement.

The New Submanagement Agreement may be terminated at any time, without the payment of any penalty, by the Board of Trustees, by the vote of a “majority of the outstanding voting securities” of the Master Equity Fund, including the Equity Fund, or by Domini, in each case on not more than 60 days’ nor less than 30 days’ written notice to the other party. The New Submanagement Agreement may also be terminated by Wellington Management on 90 days’ advance written notice to Domini and the Trustees. The New Submanagement Agreement will also terminate automatically in the event of its “assignment” (as defined in the 1940 Act).

The New Submanagement Agreement contains certain additional provisions not contained in the Existing Submanagement Agreement. The New Submanagement Agreement clarifies certain responsibilities of Domini and Wellington Management, including: (i)

- 55 -

Domini shall assume responsibility for voting proxies of securities held by the Master Equity Fund; (ii) Domini shall screen the securities submitted to it by Wellington Management according to the social and environmental criteria developed for the Master Equity Fund, and notify Wellington Management of the results of each screening; and (iii) Wellington Management shall not purchase any securities for the Master Equity Fund that do not meet the social and environmental criteria applied by the Manager. The New Submanagement Agreement also clarifies that Wellington Management will not be responsible for filing class action proofs of claim on behalf of the Master Equity Fund.

The New Submanagement Agreement provides that Wellington Management may give advice or exercise investment responsibility with respect to other accounts which may differ from advice given or the timing or nature of action taken with respect to the Master Equity Fund, provided that Wellington Management acts in good faith and provided that it is Wellington Management’s policy to allocate investment opportunities to the Master Equity Fund over a period of time on a fair and equitable basis relative to such other accounts. In addition, under the New Submanagement Agreement, Wellington Management is authorized to engage its affiliates to provide Wellington Management with investment management or advisory and related services with respect to performance by Wellington Management of its obligations under the New Submanagement Agreement. Wellington Management will remain liable for the acts and omissions of any such affiliates.

Submanagement Fees

Under the Existing Submanagement Agreement, Domini (not the Master Equity Fund) pays SSgA for its services a fee computed and paid monthly at an annual rate equal to 0.02% of the first $1 billion of net assets managed, 0.01% of the next $1 billion of net assets managed, and 0.0075% of net assets managed in excess of $2 billion of the Master Equity Fund’s average daily net assets, but in no event shall the fees paid by Domini to SSgA be less than $300,000 per year.

If the investors of the Master Equity Fund approve the New Submanagement Agreement and the New Management Agreement is

- 56 -

also approved, Domini will pay to Wellington Management an annual submanagement fee based on the following schedule:

	0.30% of the first $250 million of net assets managed
	0.25% of the next $750 million of net assets managed
	0.225% of net assets managed in excess of $1 billion

The following table demonstrates (1) the actual submanagement fees paid by Domini to SSgA for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2005; (2) the amount Domini would have paid to Wellington Management if the proposed submanagement fees under the New Submanagement Agreement had been in effect for that year; and (3) the difference between these amounts stated as a percentage:

(1)

(2)

(3)

Submanagement Fees

Paid to SSgA For the Year Ended July 31, 2005

Proposed Submanagement Fees Paid For the Year Ended July 31, 2005

Percentage Increase

$300,000

$3,900,000

1200%

Domini, not the Funds, will pay submanagement feesto Wellington Management as the submanager of the Master Equity Fund. Because the fees payable under the New Submanagement Agreement are significantly higher than the fees that are payable under the Existing Submanagement Agreement, Domini has determined it is necessary to increase its management fee charged to the Master Equity Fund. Shareholders are being asked to approve the New Management Agreement in Proposal 2 above in order to approve this proposed increase in the management fee.

If the New Submanagement Agreement and the New Management Agreement are approved, Domini will contractually agree to waive fees and/or reimburse expenses, including its management fee until at least November 30, 2007 (subject to annual renewal) so that the Equity Fund’s expenses, net of waivers and reimbursements, will not exceed, on a per annum basis, 1.15% of the average daily net assets representing Investor shares, and 0.85% of the average daily net assets representing R shares, absent an earlier modification by the Board of Trustees.

- 57 -

Factors Considered by the Board of Trustees

At a meeting held on April 28, 2006, the Board of Trustees considered the approval of the New Submanagement Agreement. In connection with their consideration of the New Submanagement Agreement, the Independent Trustees submitted to Wellington Management a written request for information in advance of the meeting. The Trustees received, reviewed and considered, among other things, reports from and presentations by Wellington Management that described, (a) the nature, extent and quality of the services proposed to be provided by Wellington Management to the Master Equity Fund, (b) the fees and other amounts proposed to be paid to Wellington Management under the New Submanagement Agreement, including information as to the fees charged and services provided to other Wellington Management subadvisory clients, (c) certain information regarding Wellington Management’s ownership structure, clients, and investment process, (d) certain information regarding Wellington Management’s performance in managing similar accounts, (e) certain information about Wellington Management’s compliance program and procedures and any regulatory issues, (f) brokerage practices, including soft dollar practices, and (g) Wellington Management’s code of ethics.

The Trustees, including all of the Independent Trustees, concluded that Wellington Management had the capabilities, resources, and personnel necessary to submanage the Master Equity Fund. The Board further concluded that, based on the services to be provided by Wellington Management to the Master Equity Fund pursuant to the New Submanagement Agreement, the fees paid by similar funds and taking into account the agreed-upon fee waivers and such other matters as the Trustees considered relevant in the exercise of their reasonable judgment, the compensation proposed to be paid to Wellington Management under the New Submanagement Agreement was fair and reasonable.

In reaching their determination to approve the New Submanagement Agreement, the Trustees considered a variety of factors they believed relevant and balanced a number of considerations. In their deliberations, the Trustees did not identify any particular information or factor that was all-important or

- 58 -

controlling. The primary factors and the conclusions are described below.

Nature, Quality, and Extent of Services Provided

The Trustees noted that pursuant to the proposed New Management Agreement between the Master Equity Fund and Domini, Domini, subject to the direction of the Board, will continue to be responsible for providing advice and guidance with respect to the Master Equity Fund and for managing the investment of the assets of the Master Equity Fund, which it proposed to do by engaging with, and overseeing the activities of, Wellington Management. It was noted that Domini will apply its social standards to a universe of securities provided by Wellington Management and that Wellington Management will provide the day-to-day portfolio management of the Master Equity Fund, including making purchases and sales of securities consistent with the Master Equity Fund’s investment objective and policies and Domini’s social and environmental standards.

The Trustees considered the scope of the services to be provided by Wellington Management under the New Submanagement Agreement and the quality of services provided by Wellington Management to its existing clients, including the Master European Fund. The Trustees also reviewed the results of interviews with several of Wellington Management’s current clients, all of which were positive.

The Trustees then considered the professional experience, tenure, and qualifications of the portfolio management team proposed for the Master Equity Fund and the other senior personnel at Wellington Management. The Trustees noted that the senior portfolio manager who would be responsible for the management of the Master Equity Fund had over 9 years of experience in the investment management field, and that there was an experienced team of investment management professionals supporting the senior portfolio manager with an average of 15 years of experience. They also reviewed Wellington Management’s compliance policies and procedures and compliance record.

- 59 -

The terms of the New Submanagement Agreement were also reviewed by the Trustees. The Trustees considered the differences between the Existing Submanagement Agreement and the New Submanagement Agreement and concluded that such changes were fair and reasonable.

Based on the foregoing, the Trustees concluded that they were satisfied with the nature, quality and extent of services to be provided by Wellington Management to the Master Equity Fund under the New Submanagement Agreement.

Performance Information

The Trustees reviewed information provided to them by Wellington Management regarding the performance of Wellington Management’s core U.S. intersection total composite, and model performance for the “core U.S. quantitative equity” strategy, the strategy that is proposed for the Master Equity Fund.

In particular, the Trustees reviewed the annualized total returns of the core U.S. intersection total composite for the 1, 3, 5 and 10 years ending December 31, 2005 and noted that those returns compared favorably to the returns of the S&P 500 Index, the benchmark for the Master Equity Fund, for the same periods.

The Trustees also considered that the model investment performance of Wellington Management’s core U.S. quantitative equity strategy, which Wellington Management proposed to adapt for the Master Equity Fund, was consistent and reasonable in relation to the historic performance of the Master Equity Fund’s benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The Trustees did, however, note the differences between the proposed investment objectives and strategies of the Master Equity Fund and the core U.S. quantitative equity strategy. In particular, the Board noted that the model performance data provided by Wellington Management did not factor in the application of Domini’s social and environmental screening process. The Trustees discussed the application of these screens with both Domini and Wellington Management. The Board noted that the proposed strategy for the Master Equity Fund is similar to the strategy currently used by Domini and Wellington Management for the Domini European Social Equity Fund and reviewed the performance of that fund as compared

- 60 -

to its benchmark, considering in particular the positive impact of the social and environmental screens on performance. The Trustees considered the performance of both the composite and the model to be acceptable when compared to the benchmark of the Master Equity Fund.

Fees and Other Expenses

The Trustees then considered the submanagement fees to be paid by Domini to Wellington Management. The Trustees compared the investment submanagement fees proposed by Wellington Management with the fees charged by the current submanager of the Master Equity Fund. They noted that the fees proposed by Wellington Management were significantly higher than the fees currently being paid to the submanager of the Master Equity Fund and considered that the increase was reasonable given that Wellington Management would be using an active, rather than a passive, investment strategy. The Trustees also reviewed the submanagement fees that Wellington Management charges its other mutual fund clients, and noted that the submanagement fees Wellington Management receives with respect to its other mutual fund clients are within the general range of the submanagement fee it would receive with respect to the Master Equity Fund. The Trustees noted that Domini (and not the Master Equity Fund) will pay Wellington Management from its management fee and that they had reviewed the management fee and comparative fee information in connection with their consideration of the New Management Agreement.

The Trustees determined, based on the nature and quality of the services to be provided by Wellington Management, and in light of the preceding factors, that the fees proposed by Wellington Management were reasonable.

Costs of Services Provided and Profitability

The Trustees also reviewed the consolidated balance sheet for Wellington Management and its subsidiaries as of December 31, 2005. The Trustees did not, however, receive information regarding the estimated costs to Wellington Management of the services proposed to be provided by it to the Master Equity Fund or

- 61 -

the estimated profits that may be realized by Wellington Management from its submanagement relationship with the Master Equity Fund. The Trustees considered that it would be difficult for Wellington Management to estimate such costs and profits given that Wellington Management had not yet provided submanagement services to the Master Equity Fund. The Trustees also noted that it would be appropriate to request and review such information when they considered the continuation of the New Submanagement Agreement.

Other Benefits

The Trustees considered the other benefits that Wellington Management and its affiliates could be expected to receive from their relationship with the Master Equity Fund. They noted in particular that none of Wellington Management or any of its affiliates would be providing any other services to the Master Equity Fund. The Trustees also considered the brokerage practices of Wellington Management. In addition, the Trustees considered the intangible benefits that may accrue to Wellington Management and its affiliates by virtue of their relationship with the Master Equity Fund.

The Trustees concluded that the benefits expected to be received by Wellington Management and its affiliates were reasonable in the context of the relationship between Wellington Management and the Master Equity Fund and supported the approval of the New Submanagement Agreement.

Economies of Scale

The Trustees also considered whether economies of scale would be realized by Wellington Management as the Master Equity Fund got larger and the extent to which economies of scale were reflected in the proposed fee schedule under the New Submanagement Agreement. The Trustees noted the breakpoints in fees that were proposed in the New Submanagement Agreement and concluded that the fee schedule as proposed would allow shareholders to share in economies of scale as the assets in the Master Equity Fund grew. The Trustees considered the inclusion of

- 62 -

the breakpoint schedule to be a positive factor supporting the approval of the New Submanagement Agreement.

Conclusion

Based upon its review, the Board of Trustees concluded the following:

The terms of the New Submanagement Agreement are reasonable, fair, and in the best interests of the Master Equity Fund and its investors, including the Equity Fund

and

The fees provided in the New Submanagement Agreement are fair and reasonable in light of the usual and customary charges made for services of the same nature and quality.

Accordingly, the Board of Trustees unanimously approved the New Submanagement Agreement and voted to recommend that shareholders vote in favor of the New Submanagement Agreement at the meeting. If the New Submanagement Agreement is approved by the investors in the Master Equity Fund and the New Management Agreement is approved as provided in Proposal 2, the New Submanagement Agreement will go into effect on November 30, 2006.

Vote Required

Approval of the New Submanagement Agreement will require the approval of “a majority of the outstanding voting securities” (as defined in the 1940 Act) of the Master Equity Fund, which means the affirmative vote by the lesser of (a) 67% or more of the shares of the Master Equity Fund present at the meeting, if more than 50% of the outstanding shares of the Master Equity Fund are represented at that meeting in person or by proxy or (b) more than 50% of the outstanding shares of the Master Equity Fund.

The New Submanagement Agreement will not go into effect unless the New Management Agreement is also approved by the investors in the Master Equity Fund. In the event that the New Submanagement Agreement and the New Management Agreement do

- 63 -

not receive the requisite approvals, Domini will either continue its relationship with SSgA, negotiate a new submanagement agreement with a different investment advisory organization, or make other appropriate arrangements, in either event subject to approval in accordance with the 1940 Act.

The Board of Trustees unanimously recommends that you vote FOR the approval of the New Submanagement Agreement.

- 64 -

Proposal 4.

To authorize the Trustees to select and change submanagers and enter into submanagement agreements without obtaining the approval of the shareholders.

Proposal 4 is intended to facilitate the efficient supervision and management of the Funds and the Master Funds by Domini and the Trustees, and to give Domini and the Trustees flexibility in managing the Funds and the Master Funds in the future. Domini continuously monitors the performance of submanagers, and may, from time to time (but it is not anticipated frequently), recommend that the Board of Trustees replace one or more submanagers or appoint additional submanagers. This depends on Domini’s assessment of what combination of submanagers it believes will optimize the chances of each Fund and Master Fund of achieving its investment objective.

The 1940 Act requires that all contracts pursuant to which persons serve as investment advisers to mutual funds be approved by shareholders. This requirement applies also to the appointment of a new or replacement submanager. The SEC has previously granted exemptions from these shareholder vote requirements provided that certain conditions are satisfied. In addition, the SEC has proposed a new rule (the "Submanager Rule") under the 1940 Act that would permit the appointment of a new or replacement submanager without the approval of shareholders if certain conditions are satisfied. The Submanager Rule, if adopted as proposed, would eliminate the need for a fund to obtain an exemptive order permitting it to appoint or replace submanagers without shareholder approval.

If the Funds and the Master Funds were to obtain similar exemptive relief or the Submanager Rule under the 1940 Act is adopted as proposed and, in either case, this proposed Proposal 4 is approved, the Board of Trustees would be able, without further shareholder approval, to appoint or replace submanagers of each of the Funds and the Master Funds. The Trustees would not, however, be able to replace Domini as investment manager without complying with the 1940 Act and applicable regulations governing shareholder approval of advisory contracts. None of the Funds or the Master Funds have yet applied for this exemptive relief, and there is no

- 65 -

assurance that the Funds or the Master Funds would receive such relief. There is also no assurance that the Submanager Rule will be adopted.

Shareholder meetings entail substantial costs which could diminish the benefits of the current submanagement arrangements. These costs must be weighed against the benefits of shareholder scrutiny of proposed contracts with additional or replacement subadvisers. Even in the absence of shareholder approval, however, any proposal to add or replace submanagers would receive careful review.

First, Domini would assess the Fund’s or Master Fund’s needs and, if it believed additional or replacement submanagers could benefit the Fund or the Master Fund, as applicable, would search for available submanagers. Second, as in the process discussed in Proposal 3, any recommendations made by Domini would have to be approved by a majority of the Trustees, including a majority of the Independent Trustees. In selecting any new or replacement submanagers, the Trustees are required to determine that: (i) an investment management agreement with the submanager is reasonable, fair and in the best interests of a Fund and its shareholders or the Master Fund and its investors, as applicable, and (ii) the fees provided in the agreement are fair and reasonable in light of the usual and customary charges made by others for services of the same nature and quality. Finally, any further appointments of additional or replacement submanagers would have to comply with any conditions contained in the SEC exemptive order, if such order is granted, or the conditions of the Submanager Rule, if such rule is adopted as proposed.

The Trustees believe that the proposed authority to select and change submanagers and enter into submanagement agreements without obtaining the approval of shareholders is in the best interests of the shareholders of each Fund and the investors in each Master Fund.

Vote Required

Approval of the proposed authority to select and change submanagers and enter into submanagement agreements without obtaining the approval of shareholders of a Fund will require the

- 66 -

approval of “a majority of the outstanding voting securities” (as defined in the 1940 Act) of that Fund. This means the affirmative vote by the lesser of (a) 67% or more of the shares of the Fund present at the meeting, if more than 50% of the outstanding shares of the Fund are represented at the meeting in person or by proxy, or (b) more than 50% of the outstanding shares of the Fund. ~~This proposal is discussed~~

By voting in ~~more detail beginning on page 11.~~ ~~-8- PART 2. INFORMATION REGARDING VOTING AND THE SPECIAL MEETING. Voting Process You can~~favor of this Proposal 4, Equity Fund and European Equity Fund shareholders will be authorizing the Equity Fund or the European Equity Fund, as applicable, to vote ~~in any one~~at the meeting of the ~~following ways: o By mail,~~applicable Master Fund’s investors in favor of authorizing the Master Fund’s Trustees to select and change submanagers and enter into submanagement agreements without the approval of investors in that Master Fund. For each Master Fund, approval of the proposed authority to select and change submanagers and enter into submanagement agreements without obtaining the approval of the investors in that Master Fund will require the approval of “a majority of the outstanding voting securities” (as defined in the 1940 Act) of that Master Fund. This means the affirmative vote by ~~filling out~~the lesser of (a) 67% or more of the interests of the Master Fund present at the meeting, if more than 50% of the outstanding interests of the Master Fund are represented at the meeting in person or by proxy, or (b) more than 50% of the outstanding interests of the Master Fund.

The Board of Trustees unanimously recommends that you vote FOR authorizing the Trustees to select and ~~returning~~change submanagers and enter into submanagement agreements without obtaining the approval of shareholders.

***

Management knows of no other business to be presented at the meeting. If any additional matters should be properly presented at the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof, it is intended that the enclosed proxy ~~card o By telephone, by dialing toll-free 1-800-690-6903 o On~~(if not limited to the ~~Internet, by visiting~~contrary) will be voted in accordance with the ~~website printed on your proxy card o In person at~~judgment of the ~~meeting~~ persons named in the enclosed form of proxy.

- 67 -

PART 3.

INFORMATION REGARDING VOTING AND THE SPECIAL MEETING.

Voting Process

You can vote in any one of the following ways:

Mail: Complete, sign and mail your proxy card using the enclosed postage-paid envelope.

Phone: Call the toll-free number printed on your proxy card and follow the instructions.

Online: Visit the website printed on your proxy card and follow the instructions.

In person at the meeting.

Whichever method you choose to vote, please carefully read this ~~Proxy Statement,~~proxy statement, which describes in detail the proposals upon which you are asked to vote.

Your votes will be tabulated as follows:

The votes of the shareholders of the Funds will be tabulated together for Proposal 1.

Only votes of the shareholders of the Domini Social Equity Fund will be tabulated for Proposals 2 and 3;

The votes of the shareholders of each of the Domini Social Equity Fund, the Domini European Social Equity Fund and the Domini Social Bond Fund will be tabulated separately for Proposal 4.

If you return your proxy and fail to provide instructions as to how to vote your shares with respect to any proposal, your shares will be voted FOR that proposal.

- 68 -

Record Date

The close of business on ~~May 10, 2005,~~June 1, 2006, has been fixed as the Record Date for the determination of shareholders entitled to notice of and to vote at the meeting. 5,842,652.749 Investor shares of the Fund ($0.00001 par value) were outstanding as of the close of business on the Record Date. There were no Class R shares of the Fund outstanding as of the close of business on the Record Date. As a shareholder of record at the close of business on the Record Date, you will be entitled to one vote for each dollar of net asset value represented by the shares you own in the Fund.

Quorum

Holders of a majority of the shares of ~~the~~each Fund outstanding on the Record Date constitute a quorum and must be present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting for purposes of voting on Proposals2, 3 and 4, as applicable. For purposes of voting on Proposal 1 (the election of Trustees), holders of a majority of the ~~proposal~~ ~~-9- to approve~~shares of the ~~submanagement agreement with Seix Advisors.~~Funds (taken together) outstanding on the Record Date constitute a quorum and must be present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting. Your shares will be represented by proxy at the meeting if you vote by mail, by telephone, or on the ~~Internet. Regardless~~Internet, or in person.

If you vote, regardless of how you vote ("(“For,~~" "Against,"~~” “Against” (or, with respect to Proposal 1 only, “Withhold”), or ~~"Abstain"~~“Abstain”), your shares will be counted for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum. In addition, broker ~~"non-votes"~~“non-votes” (that is shares held by brokers or nominees as to which (a) instructions have not been received from the beneficial owner or other persons entitled to vote and (b) the broker or nominee does not have discretionary power to vote on a particular matter) will be counted for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum.

If you mark ~~"Abstain"~~“Abstain” on your proxy card with respect to any proposal on which you are entitled to vote, your vote will have the effect of a ~~"no" vote for purposes of obtaining the requisite approval of Proposal 1. Broker "non-votes" will also have the effect of a "no"~~“no” vote for purposes of obtaining the requisite approval of Proposals 2, 3 and 4, as applicable. Broker “non-votes” will also have the effect of a “no” vote for purposes of obtaining the requisite approval of Proposals 2, 3 and 4, as applicable. Abstentions and broker “non-votes” will have no effect on the outcome of the voting for Proposal 1 ~~and 2.~~ (the election of Trustees).

Revoking Your Proxy

You may revoke your proxy at any time prior to the meeting (or any adjournment or postponement thereof) by putting your revocation

- 69 -

in writing, signing it, and either delivering it to the meeting or sending it to Carole M. Laible, Treasurer of the Domini Funds, 536 Broadway, ~~7th~~7^th Floor, New York, New York 10012. You may also revoke your proxy by voting in person at the meeting.

Adjournments and Postponements

If sufficient votes in favor of any proposal are not received, the persons named as proxies may propose one or more adjournments or postponements of the meeting to permit further solicitation of proxies with respect to that proposal. An adjournment or postponement of the meeting will suspend the meeting to another time. Any ~~such~~ adjournment will require the affirmative vote of a majority of those shares voted at the meeting. If you voted in favor of a proposal or failed to provide instructions as to how to vote your shares with respect to a proposal, the persons named as proxies will vote your shares in favor of the adjournment of the meeting with respect to that proposal. If you voted against or abstained from voting on a proposal, the persons named as ~~-10-~~ proxies will vote your shares against any such adjournment. Any proposals for which sufficient favorable votes have been received by the time of the meeting may be acted upon and considered final regardless of whether the meeting is adjourned to permit the additional solicitation of proxies with respect to any other proposals.

Master/Feeder Voting Process

Domini Social Equity Fund.The Equity Fund invests substantially all of its assets in the Master Equity Fund. Investors in the Master Equity Fund will be asked to vote on the matters described under Proposals 1, 2, 3 and 4 at a meeting of the Master Equity Fund’s investors. The Equity Fund, as an investor in the Master Equity Fund, will vote its interest in the Master Equity Fund at that meeting. The Equity Fund will cast all of its votes with respect to each of Proposals 1, 2, 3 and 4 in the same proportion as the votes of the Equity Fund’s shareholders cast at the meeting on that Proposal. If you vote in favor of Proposals 1, 2, 3 and 4, you will be authorizing the Equity Fund to vote in favor of that Proposal at the meeting of the Master Equity Fund’s investors. The Equity Fund will cast its votes for which it receives no instructions in the same proportion as the votes for which it does, in fact, receive instructions.

- 70 -

Domini European Social Equity Fund.The European Equity Fund invests substantially all of its assets in the Master European Fund. Investors in the Master European Fund will be asked to vote on the matters described under Proposals 1 and 4 at a meeting of the Master European Fund’s investors. The European Equity Fund, as an investor in the Master European Fund, will vote its interest in the Master European Fund at that meeting. The European Equity Fund will cast all of its votes with respect to each of Proposals 1 and 4 in the same proportion as the votes of the European Equity Fund’s shareholders cast at the meeting on that Proposal. If you vote in favor of Proposals 1 or 4, you will be authorizing the European Equity Fund to vote in favor of that Proposal at the meeting of the Master European Fund’s investors. The European Equity Fund will cast its votes for which it receives no instructions in the same proportion as the votes for which it does, in fact, receive instructions.

Proxy Solicitation Costs

The cost of soliciting proxies, including the fees of a proxy soliciting agent (which are expected to be approximately ~~$50,000)~~$250,000), will be borne by the ~~Fund.~~Funds. In addition to solicitation by mail, proxies may be solicited by the Board of Trustees, officers, and regular employees and agents of the ~~Fund~~Funds without compensation. The ~~Fund~~Funds may reimburse brokerage firms and others for their expenses in forwarding proxy materials to the beneficial owners and soliciting them to execute the proxies.By voting as soon as you receive your proxy materials, you will help reduce the cost of additional solicitations. ~~-11- PART 3. THE PROPOSALS. Proposal 1. To vote on~~

- 71 -

PART 4.

INFORMATION REGARDING EACH FUND.

Outstanding Shares; Interests of Certain Persons

As of June 1, 2006, shares outstanding were as follows:

Name of Fund/Class	Total Number ofShares Outstanding	Number of Shares Outstanding Per Class
Domini Social Equity Fund	41,322,138.889
Investor Shares		37,354,270.238
Class R Shares		3,967,868.651
Domini European Social Equity Fund	3,894,410.131
Domini Social Bond Fund	6,163,399.067

As of June 1, 2006, to the best knowledge of the Funds, the following persons owned of record 5% or more of the outstanding shares of the Funds:

Name of Fund/Class	Shareowner	Number of Shares	Percent of Shares
Domini Social Equity Fund
Investor Shares	Charles Schwab & Co. Inc., Reinvest Account	5,351,770.503	14.33%
	Manulife Financial	3,360,185.338	9.00%
	Fidelity Investments Inst. Operations Co. Inc.	3,073,095.330	8.23%
	National Financial Services Corp	2,298,532.945	6.15%
Class R Shares	Fidelity Invest Inst Operations Co., Inc	2,016,566.141	50.82%
	T Rowe Price Retirement Plan Services	827,667.656	20.86%
	Charles Schwab & Co Inc., Special Custody Account	577,181.323	14.55%
	Wells Fargo Bank NA	383,734.821	9.67%

- 72 -

Name of Fund/Class	Shareowner	Number of Shares	Percent of Shares
Domini European Social Equity Fund
	NFS LLC FEBO, Bank of America NA, Loring, Wolcott & Coolidge GLBL	1,313,687.728	33.71%
	Charles Schwab & Co, Inc. Reinvest Account	511,102.229	13.12%
Domini Social Bond Fund
	Charles Schwab and Co Inc., Special Custody Account	1,759,370.168	28.57%
	National Financial Services LLC	461,903.957	7.50%

Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board has selected KPMG LLP (“KPMG”) to serve as the independent public accountant for each Fund. Representatives of KPMG are not expected to be present at the Special Meeting, but will have the opportunity to make a ~~Submanagement Agreement~~statement if they wish, and will be available by telephone to respond to appropriate questions.

Accounting Fees and Services

The information under each of the subheadings below show the aggregate fees KPMG billed to the Funds for its professional services rendered for the Domini Social Bond Fund between Seix Advisors, the fixed-income division of Trusco Capital Management, Inc., and Domini Social Investments LLC. Background Domini Social Investments LLC, a Massachusetts limited liability company ("Domini"), 536 Broadway, 7th Floor, New York, New York 10012, manages the assetsFunds’ most recently completed fiscal years.

Audit Fees. The aggregate fees billed for each of the ~~Domini Social Bond Fund (the "Fund") pursuant~~last two fiscal years for professional services rendered by KPMG for the audit of the Funds’ annual financial statements or services that are normally provided by KPMG in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements for those fiscal years are set forth below:

Fund		2005		2004
Domini Social Equity Fund	$	12,750	$	12,000
Domini Social Bond Fund	$	20,000	$	19,000

- 73 -

Audit-Related Fees. There were no fees billed for the Funds’ two most recently completed fiscal years for assurance and related services by the principal accountant that were reasonably related to ~~a Management Agreement dated as~~the performance of ~~May 1, 2000 (the "Management Agreement"). The Management Agreement was~~the audit or review of the registrant’s financial statements and are not reported under theAudit Feescaption above.

There were no audit-related fees billed by KPMG for the Funds’ two most recently completed fiscal years, that were required to be approved by the Board of Trustees of the Fund on April 29, 2005. The Management Agreement was most recently submitted to a vote of shareholders in the Fund on May 31, 2000, in connection with its initial approval. Subject to the terms of the Management Agreement, Domini is responsibleregistrant’s Audit Committee for the management of the Fund. As part of its responsibilities as portfolio manager, Domini selects and employs, subject to the review and approval of the Board of Trustees of the Fund, one or more submanagers to invest the Fund's assets consistent with the Fund's investment objective and the guidelines and directions set by Domini and the Board of Trustees, and reviews the submanager's continued performance. Domini's selection of a submanager is subject to the review and approval of the Board of Trustees of the Fund and the Fund's shareholders. Domini may terminate the services of a submanager at any time. Prior to March 1, 2005, ShoreBank served as the submanager of the Fund pursuant to a Submanagement Agreement, dated as of May 1, 2000, between ShoreBank and Domini (the "ShoreBank Submanagement Agreement"). ShoreBank is an Illinois banking corporation, and its principal executive office is at 7054 S. Jeffery Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60649. As submanager, ShoreBank was responsible for the day-to-day -12- management of the Fund and for investing the Fund's assets in a manner consistent with the terms of the ShoreBank Submanagement Agreement and the investment objectives of the Fund. The ShoreBank Submanagement Agreement was most recently approved by the Board of Trustees of the Fund on April 30, 2004. The ShoreBank Submanagement Agreement was most recently submitted to a vote of shareholders in the Fund on May 31, 2000, in connection with its initial approval. At a regular meeting of the Board of Trustees of the Fund held on January 28, 2005, the Board considered the termination of ShoreBank as the submanager of the Fund. The Board reviewed the services provided by ShoreBank as submanager and considered Domini's long and collegial relationship with ShoreBank. However, the Fund was ShoreBank's only mutual fund client and as assets grew, Domini and ShoreBank came to the mutual recognition that the Fund's shareholders would be best served by an investment adviser managing other mutual funds. The Board also considered Domini's recommendation that Seix Advisors, the fixed-income division of Trusco Capital Management, Inc. ("Seix Advisors"), be appointed as the submanager of the Fund. As discussed below under the heading "Evaluation by the Board of Trustees," Domini, at the direction of the Board, terminated the ShoreBank Submanagement Agreement and entered into a submanagement agreement with Seix Advisors. Accordingly, effective at the close of business on February 28, 2005, the ShoreBank Submanagement Agreement was terminated. The Submanagement Agreement with Seix Advisors (the "Seix Advisors Submanagement Agreement") became effective on March 1, 2005. The Submanagement Agreements The terms of the Seix Advisors Submanagement Agreement (other than the investment advisory fees to be paid by Domini to Seix Advisors) are substantially similar to those of the ShoreBank Submanagement Agreement. A description of the investment advisory fees to be paid by Domini to Seix Advisors is set forth below under the heading "Investment Advisory Fees." -13- Term of Seix Advisors Submanagement Agreement The Seix Advisors Submanagement Agreement became effective on March 1, 2005. If approved by the vote of the holders of a "majority of the outstanding voting securities" (as defined under the heading "Vote Required" below) of the Fund, the Seix Advisors Submanagement Agreement will continue in effect until March 1, 2007, and thereafter from year to year, subject to approval annually by the Board of Trustees of the Fund or the shareholders of the Fund in accordance with the 1940 Act. The Seix Advisors Submanagement Agreement may be terminated at any time without the payment of any penalty by the Board of Trustees of the Fund, by the vote of a "majority of the outstanding voting securities" of the Fund, or by Domini. The Seix Advisors Submanagement Agreement may also be terminated by Seix Advisors on 90 days' advance written notice to Domini. The Seix Advisors Submanagement Agreement will also terminate automatically in the event of its "assignment" (as defined in the 1940 Act). Comparison of Submanagement Agreements Under the Seix Advisors Submanagement Agreement, as under the ShoreBank Submanagement Agreement, the submanager will be responsible for the day-to-day management of the Fund, subject always to the provisions of the 1940 Act and to the investment objectives, policies, procedures, and restrictions imposed by the Fund's then current Registration Statement under the 1940 Act and the Fund's Declaration of Trust and By-Laws. Like the ShoreBank Submanagement Agreement, the Seix Advisors Submanagement Agreement provides that Domini or the Trustees of the Fund may, at any time, suspend or restrict the right of the submanager to determine what securities will be purchased or soldrendered on behalf of ~~the Fund~~Domini and what portion, if any, of the assets of the Fund allocated by Domini to the submanager will be held uninvested. Seix Advisors will also provide Domini with such investment advice and reports and data as are requested by Domini. Like the ShoreBank Submanagement Agreement, the Seix Advisors Submanagement Agreement provides that the submanager will not be liable for any error of judgment or mistake of law, for any loss arising out of any investment, or for any act or omission in the execution of securities transactions for the Fund, except for willful misfeasance, bad faith, or gross negligence in the performance of its duties, or by reason of reckless -14- disregard of its obligations under the Seix Advisors Submanagement Agreement. You should refer to Exhibit A attached to this Proxy Statement for the complete Seix Advisors Submanagement Agreement. The description of the Seix Advisors Submanagement Agreement in this Proxy Statement is qualified in its entirety by the provisions of the Seix Advisors Submanagement Agreement in Exhibit A. Investment Advisory Fees Under the ShoreBank Submanagement Agreement, Domini (not the Fund) paid ShoreBank for its services a fee computed and paid monthly at an annual rate equal to 0.20% of the Fund's average daily net assets. Seix Advisors' management fees are also paid by Domini, not the Fund. From March 1, 2005, to but not including July 29, 2005, or if earlier, the date on which the Seix Advisors Submanagement Agreement is approved by the shareholders of the Fund, Domini will pay to Seix Advisors a submanagement fee, accrued daily and paid monthly at an annual rate equal to 0.20% of the average daily net assets of the Fund allocated to Seix Advisors. If the shareholders of the Fund approve the Seix Advisors Submanagement Agreement, Domini will pay to Seix Advisors an annual submanagement fee based on the following schedule (the "Approved Fee Schedule"): 0.40% on the first $10 million of net assets managed 0.35% on the next $10 million of net assets managed 0.30% on the next $30 million of net assets managed 0.25% on the next $30 million of net assets managed 0.20% on the next $120 million of net assets managed 0.15% on the next $300 million of net assets managed 0.10% on the next $500 million of net assets managed 0.05% over $1 billion of net assets managed In addition, if the shareholders of the Fund approve the Seix Advisors Submanagement Agreement, Domini will pay a one-time fee equal to $25,000 to Seix Advisors for services to be provided by Seix -15- Advisors to the Fund from and after the date of such approval. Seix Advisors will be required to return such amount to Domini if Seix Advisors resigns as the submanager of the Fund prior to December 31, 2005. Notwithstanding the above fees, the subadvisory fees payable by Domini will not exceed $180,000 for the period from March 1, 2005, through March 1, 2006. Approval of the Seix Advisors Submanagement Agreement will have no effect upon the amount of advisory fees paid by the Fund to Domini. Domini, not the Fund, will pay investment management fees to Seix Advisors as the submanager to the Fund. Until November 30, 2005, Domini has contractually agreed to waive fees and/or reimburse expenses, including its management fee, so that the Fund's expenses, net of waivers and reimbursements, will not exceed, on a per annum basis, 0.95% of the average daily net assets representing Investor shares, absent an earlier modification by the Board of Trustees, which oversees the Fund. The approval of the Seix Advisors Submanagement Agreement will have no effect on this contractual fee waiver or the total annual operating expenses of the Fund. Fees payable to ShoreBank for services provided under the ShoreBank Submanagement Agreement for the Fund's 2004 fiscal year (August 1, 2003, to July 31, 2004) were $107,059. Neither ShoreBank, nor any affiliated person of ShoreBank, nor any affiliated person of any such affiliated person received any other fees from Domini or from the Fund for services provided to the Fund during the Fund's 2004 fiscal year. There were no other material payments by Domini or the Fund to ShoreBank, any affiliated person of ShoreBank, or any affiliated person of any such affiliated person, during the Fund's 2004 fiscal year. If the Seix Advisors Submanagement Agreement had been in effect during the Fund's 2004 fiscal year, the fees that would have been payable by Domini to Seix Advisors for services provided pursuant to the Seix Advisors Submanagement Agreement, based on the Approved Fee Schedule, would have been $173,824. The aggregate of these fees represents a 62.4% increase from the amount of fees that Domini paid to ShoreBank for that period under the ShoreBank Submanagement Agreement. This increase in fees is borne by Domini, not by the Fund or its shareholders. -16- For the Fund's 2004 fiscal year, no commissions were paid to any broker (a) that is an affiliated person of the Fund, (b) that is an affiliated person of any affiliated person of the Fund, or (c) an affiliated person of which is an affiliated person of the Fund, Domini, ShoreBank, Seix Advisors, or the distributor of the Fund. Information Regarding Seix Advisors Seix Advisors is the fixed-income division of Trusco Capital Management, Inc. ("Trusco"). Trusco is a wholly owned subsidiary of SunTrust Banks, Inc. ("SunTrust"). Seix Advisors is located at 10 Mountainview Road, Suite C-200, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458. Seix Advisors has been in the business of providing investment advisory services since 1992 and was acquired by Trusco in 2004. As of March 31, 2005, Trusco had more than $69.6 billion in assets under management. Management and Governance. Listed in the following chart are the names, positions, and principal occupations of the members of the Board of Directors and the principal executive officers of Trusco as of March 31, 2005. The principal business address of Christina Seix and John Talty, each an Executive Vice President of Trusco, is at the offices of Seix Advisors, 10 Mountainview Road, Suite C-200, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458. The address of each of the other Directors and principal executive officers of Trusco is 50 Hurt Plaza, Suite 1400, Atlanta, Georgia 30303. ~~-17-~~
~~Position with Trusco Capital Name Management, Inc. Other Principal Occupation~~ David Chairman President, Institutional Eidson Investment Management, SunTrust Paul Secretary, Executive Vice N/A Robertson President William H. Director Executive Vice President, Rogers, Jr. SunTrust Wealth and Investment Management, SunTrust Doug President, Chief Executive N/A Phillips Officer, and Chief Investment Officer John Chief Financial Officer N/A Stebbins Patrick Managing Director of Human N/A Paparelli Resources/Compliance/ Legal Deborah Chief Compliance Officer Chief Compliance Officer, Lamb STI Classic Funds
~~-18-~~
Christina Executive Vice President Chief Executive Officer Seix and Chief Investment John Executive Vice President President of Seix Advisors Talty
No officer or Trustee of the Fund currently is an officer or employee of Seix Advisors, Trusco, or SunTrust, or a member of either Trusco's or SunTrust's Board of Directors. No officer or Trustee of the Fund has any other material direct or indirect interest in the proposal to approve the Seix Advisors Submanagement Agreement or in Seix Advisors, Trusco, or SunTrust, or any other personentities controlling, controlled by, or under common control with ~~Seix Advisors, Trusco, or SunTrust. Since August 1, 2003, none of the officers or Trustees of the Fund has had~~Domini (not including any ~~material interest, direct or indirect, in any material transactions, or in any material proposed transactions, to which Seix Advisors, Trusco, or SunTrust was or~~subadviser whose role is to be a party. Seix Advisors, the fixed-income division of Trusco, acts as the investment adviser for those investment-grade fixed-income mutual funds listed on Exhibit B attached hereto. Information concerning the net assets of those mutual funds and the fees paid to Seix Advisors for its services to those investment-grade fixed-income mutual funds is also provided on Exhibit B. The Evaluation by the Board of Trustees The Board of Trustees of the Fund terminated the ShoreBank Submanagement Agreement and approved the Seix Advisors Submanagement Agreement at a meeting held on January 28, 2005. Before terminating the ShoreBank Submanagement Agreement, the Board of Trustees of the Fund reviewed with Domini its recommendation that ShoreBank be terminated as the submanager of the Fund. Domini reviewed ShoreBank's fees in comparison to the fee rates proposed by Seix Advisors. Domini also reviewed the services that ShoreBank provided to the Fund in comparison to the services proposed to be provided by Seix Advisors. The Board considered Domini's long and collegial relationship -19- with ShoreBank. However, the Fund was ShoreBank's only mutual fund client, and as assets grew, Domini and ShoreBank came to the mutual recognition that the Fund's shareholders would be best served by an investment adviser managing other mutual funds. The Board of Trustees then reviewed Domini's procedure for selecting a new submanager for the Fund. The Board of Trustees noted that Domini had conducted an extensive due diligence process with respect to seven candidates for the submanager position. This due diligence process involved a review of extensive questionnaires completed by submanager candidates, a review of publicly available filings and disciplinary records of each candidate, and in-person meetings to evaluate the quality of services and capability of each candidate. This due diligence process resulted in Domini's recommendation of Seix Advisors as submanager to the Domini Social Bond Fund. The Board of Trustees concluded that Domini had reviewed a sufficient pool of potential submanager candidates and had conducted an adequate due diligence process. The Board of Trustees then met with a representative of Seix Advisors. The Trustees considered information with respect to Seix Advisors and whether the Seix Advisors Submanagement Agreement was in the best interests of the Fund and its shareholders. The Trustees considered the nature and quality of services expected to be provided by Seix Advisors. They noted that Seix Advisors had over $23 billion in fixed-income assets underprimarily portfolio management and reviewed a list of representative clients. The Trustees also reviewed and discussed information regarding Seix Advisors' knowledge and experience in managing fixed-income portfolios. The Trustees notedis subcontracted with or overseen by another investment adviser) that the senior portfolio manager who would be responsible for the management of the Fund had over 23 years of experience in the investment management field, and that there was an experienced team of investment management professionals supporting the senior portfolio manager. The Trustees noted that there had been nearly no portfolio manager turnover at Seix Advisors since the inception of the firm. In evaluating Seix Advisors' ability to provide ongoing services to the ~~Fund, the Trustees considered additional information as to Seix Advisors' business organization, financial resources, personnel, technology systems, and other matters.~~registrant (“Service Providers”).

Tax Fees. The ~~Trustees concluded that Seix Advisors had the capability to provide solid and consistent investment management services with an experienced and dedicated team of management professionals.~~ ~~-20- The Trustees also reviewed the investment performance of Seix Advisors' investment-grade fixed-income composite and compared this investment performance with that~~aggregate fees billed by KPMG in each of the ~~Fund's benchmark index.~~last two fiscal years for professional services rendered for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning are set forth below.

Fund		2005		2004
Domini Social Equity Fund	$	5,000	$	4,750
Domini Social Bond Fund	$	5,000	$	4,750

There were no tax fees billed by KPMG for the Funds’ two most recently completed fiscal years, that were required to be approved by the registrant’s Audit Committee for services rendered on behalf of the registrant’s Service Providers.

All Other Fees. There were no other fees billed by KPMG for the Funds’ two most recently completed fiscal years for non-audit services provided by KPMG, other than the services reported under theAudit Fees,Audit-Related Fees,orTax Fees captions above.

There were no other fees billed by KPMG for the Funds’ two most recently completed fiscal years that were required to be approved by the registrant’s Audit Committee for other non-audit services rendered on behalf of the registrant’s Service Providers.

- 74 -

Aggregate Non-Audit Fees. The ~~Trustees considered~~aggregate non-audit fees billed by KPMG for services rendered to the Funds were the tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning fees listed in theTax Fees caption above and are set forth below. No non-audit fees were billed by KPMG for services rendered to the Funds’ Service Providers for the last two fiscal years of the Funds.

	For the fiscal year ended July 31, 2005:	$10,000
	For the fiscal year ended July 31, 2004:	$9,500

Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

The Charter of the Audit Committee of the Board requires that the ~~returns~~Committee pre-approve all audit and non-audit services provided by KPMG relating to the operations or financial reporting of the ~~composite were higher than~~registrant and all non-audit services provided by KPMG to the ~~returns of both~~registrant’s Service Providers if the ~~Fund~~engagement relates directly to the operations and ~~the Fund's benchmark, the Lehman Brothers Intermediate Aggregate Index (LBIA), for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003. The Trustees also noted that the average annual total returns~~financial reporting of the composite compared favorably with those of the Fund and the LBIA for the one- and two-year periods ended December 31, 2004. The Trustees considered that the performance of the composite slightly lagged the performance of the Fund and the LBIA for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, but determined that the amount of such underperformance was not significant. The Trustees also compared the performance of the Seix Advisors' composite with the performance information provided by the other investment managers considered by Domini and determined that the composite's performance was consistent with the performance of the other candidates. The Trustees concluded that the investment performance of the Seix Advisors' composite was consistent and reasonable in relationregistrant. Prior to the ~~historic performance~~commencement of any audit or non-audit services, the Fund and the Fund's benchmark index. The Trustees also considered Seix Advisors' trading capabilities and reviewed its systems for executing the Fund's trades with broker-dealers. Although performance was a factor considered in the selection of a submanager, past performance is not indicative of future results, and performance over the benchmark and peers cannot be guaranteed. The Trustees also reviewed the investment management fees proposed by Seix Advisors (including the one-time fee of $25,000 to be paid by Domini to Seix Advisors upon the approval of the Seix Advisors Submanagement Agreement by the Fund's shareholders). The Trustees compared the investment management fees proposed by Seix Advisors with those proposed by other investment managers and the fees charged by ShoreBank. They noted that the fees proposed by Seix Advisors as well as the fees proposed by the other investment managers were higher than the fees paid to ShoreBank. The Trustees noted that, because as manager, Domini pays the submanager, Domini would bear the higher investment management fees charged by Seix Advisors. The Trustees also considered that the fees proposed by Seix Advisers generally were either lower than those proposed by other investment managers or contained a more favorable breakpoint schedule than those proposed by other managers. They -21- considered carefully the few instances where the fees proposed by other investment managers were slightly lower than those proposed by Seix Advisors and determined, based on the nature and quality ofAudit Committee reviews the services to determine whether they are appropriate and permissible under applicable law.

There were no services described above (including services required to be ~~provided~~approved by ~~Seix Advisors,~~the audit committee pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(ii) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X) that were approved by the ~~fees proposed by Seix Advisors were reasonable in relation~~audit committee pursuant to the other proposals received. The Trustees noted that they would consider the profits realized by Seix Advisors and its affiliates in providing services to the Fund when they considered whether to approve the continuanceparagraph (c)(7)(i)(C) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X. None of the ~~agreement. The Trustees reviewed~~hours expended on the ~~compliance policies and procedures of Seix Advisors as well as biographical information about~~principal accountant’s engagement to audit the Chief Compliance Officer of Trusco and supporting compliance department personnel. They noted that Seix Advisors had a clean disciplinary record and had systems in place in order to identify potential compliance issues. In particular, they noted that Seix Advisors had an automated guideline compliance system in place that would assist in preventing violations of the Fund's investment objectives and policies. In addition, the Trustees reviewed Seix Advisors' social profile, including its experience with managing socially screened accounts, the diversity of its management team and employees, and its commitment to community development. The Trustees noted that Seix Advisors managed approximately $5 billion in assets for clients with a variety of social standards. The Trustees considered that Seix Advisors was founded by a Hispanic woman, Christina Seix, and that the firm demonstrated a commitment to diversity in its workforce. The Trustees also reviewed SunTrust's activities in community-focused lending. Based upon its review, the Board of Trustees concluded the following: o Seix Advisors had demonstrated the ability to manage socially screened accounts, trade efficiently, and provide the information and analyses needed by Domini. o The terms of the Seix Advisors Submanagement Agreement were reasonable, fair, and in the best interests of the Fund and its shareholders. -22- o The fees provided in the Seix Advisors Submanagement Agreement were fair and reasonable in light of the usual and customary charges made for services of the same nature and quality. Accordingly, after consideration of the above factors, and such other factors and information as it deemed relevant, the Board of Trustees terminated the ShoreBank Submanagement Agreement and approved the Seix Advisors Submanagement Agreement. The Seix Advisors Submanagement Agreement went into effect on March 1, 2005. Vote Required Approval of the Seix Advisors Submanagement Agreement will require the approval of "a majority of the outstanding voting securities" (as defined in the 1940 Act) of the Fund, which means the affirmative vote by the lesser of (a) 67% or more of the shares of the Fund present at the meeting, if more than 50% of the outstanding shares of the Fund are represented at that meeting in person or by proxy or (b) more than 50% of the outstanding shares of the Fund. In the event that the Seix Advisors Submanagement Agreement does not receive the requisite approval, Domini will negotiate a new investment submanagement agreement with a different investment advisory organization or make other appropriate arrangements, in either event subject to approval in accordance with the 1940 Act. The Board of Trustees unanimously recommends that you vote FOR the approval of the Seix Advisors Submanagement Agreement. - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Proposal 2. To transact such other business as may properly come before the Special Meeting of Shareholders and any adjournments of the Special Meeting. The management of the Fund knows of no other business to be presented at the meeting. If any additional matters should be properly presented, it is intended that the enclosed proxy (if not limited to the contrary) will be voted in accordance with the judgment of the persons named in the enclosed form of proxy. ~~-23- PART 4. INFORMATION REGARDING THE FUND. Annual Report Each of the Fund's Annual Report~~Funds’ financial statements for the fiscal year ended July 31, ~~2004, including audited financial statements, and~~2005 were attributable to work performed by persons other than the Fund's Semi-Annual Report for the period ended January 31, 2005, has previously been sent to shareholders. Both reports are available without charge by written request to Domini Social Investments, P.O. Box 9785, Providence, RI 02940-9785, by calling Domini at 1-800-582-6757, or by downloading the reports from our website at www.domini.com. principal accountant’s full-time, permanent employees.

Additional Information ~~The~~

Each Fund is a series of the Domini Social Investment Trust, ~~(the "Trust"),~~ a diversified, open-end registered investment company organized as a Massachusetts business trust under a Second Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust dated as of May 15, 2001. The ~~Fund was designated as a separate series of the Trust on January 20, 2000. The~~ mailing address of the ~~Trust~~Funds is 536 Broadway, ~~7th~~7^th Floor, New York, New York 10012. ~~The Fund's~~

- 75 -

Each Fund’s distributor is DSIL Investment Services LLC, 536 Broadway, ~~7th~~7^th Floor, New York, New York 10012. PFPC Inc. acts as transfer agent and dividend disbursing agent for the ~~Fund.~~Funds. The principal business address of PFPC Inc. is 4400 Computer Drive, Westborough, Massachusetts 01581. Investors Bank & Trust Company ~~("IBT"~~(“IBT”) acts as the custodian for the ~~Fund. IBT's~~Funds. IBT’s principal business address is 200 Clarendon Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02116.

Shareholders Sharing the Same Address

To keep ~~the Fund's~~each Fund’s costs as low as possible, and to conserve paper usage, we attempt to eliminate duplicate mailings to the same address where practical. When two or more Fund shareholders have the same last name and address, only one proxy statement is being sent to that address unless ~~the~~a Fund has received contrary instructions from one or more of those shareholders. If your household is receiving separate mailings that you feel are unnecessary, or if you want us to send separate mailings in the future, please send a written request to the ~~Trust~~Funds at the mailing address provided above or call Domini Funds at 1-800-582-6757. If you want to receive a separate copy of this proxy statement, one will be delivered to you promptly upon such written or oral request. ~~-24-~~

Submission of Certain Proposals

The Domini Social Investment Trust is a Massachusetts business trust and as such is not required to hold annual meetings of shareholders, although special meetings may be called for the ~~Fund,~~Funds, for purposes such as electing Trustees or removing Trustees, changing fundamental policies, or approving an advisory contract. Shareholder proposals to be presented at any subsequent meeting of shareholders must be received by the Trust at the ~~Trust's~~Trust’s office within a reasonable time before the proxy solicitation is made.

By Order of the Board of Trustees,

Carole M. Laible, Treasurer ~~May 23, 2005~~ ~~A-1~~

June 15, 2006

A- 1

Exhibit A ~~--------- SUBMANAGEMENT~~

NOMINATING COMMITTEE CHARTER

Nominating Committee Charter

Adopted as of April 30, 2004

The Board of Trustees (the “Board”) of each of the Domini Social Index Portfolio, the Domini Social Investment Trust and the Domini Institutional Trust (each, a “Trust”) has adopted this Charter to govern the activities of the Nominating Committee (the “Committee”) of the Board.

Statement of Purpose and Responsibility

The selection and nomination of the independent Trustees is committed to the discretion of the then independent Trustees of the Trust. The primary purpose and responsibility of the Committee is the screening and nomination of candidates for election to the Board as independent trustees.

Organization and Governance

The Committee shall be comprised of as many Trustees as the Board shall determine, but in any event not fewer than two (2) Trustees. The Committee must consist entirely of Board members who are not “interested persons” of the Trust, as defined in Section 2(a)(19) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended. The Board may remove or replace any member of the Committee at any time in its sole discretion.

One or more members of the Committee may be designated by the Board as the Committee’s chairman or co-chairman, as the case may be.

The Committee will not have regularly scheduled meetings. Committee meetings shall be held as and when the Committee or the Board determines necessary or appropriate in accordance with the Trust’s Bylaws.

A- 2

Qualifications for Trustee Nominees

The Committee requires thatTrustee candidates have a college degree or equivalent business experience. The Committee may take into account a wide variety of factors in considering Trustee candidates, including (but not limited to): (i) availability and commitment of a candidate to attend meetings and perform his or her responsibilities on the Board, (ii) relevant industry and related experience, (iii) educational background, (iv) ability, judgment and expertise and (v) overall diversity of the Board’s composition.

Identification of Nominees

In identifying potential nominees for the Board, the Committee may consider candidates recommended by one or more of the following sources: (i) the Trust’s current Trustees; (ii) the Trust’s officers; (iii) the Trust’s investment adviser or subadvisers; (iv) shareholders of any series of the Trust (see below); and (v) any other source the Committee deems to be appropriate. The Committee may, but is not required to, retain a third party search firm at the Trust’s expense to identify potential candidates.

Consideration of Candidates Recommended By Shareholders

The Committee will consider and evaluate nominee candidates properly submitted by shareholders on the same basis as it considers and evaluates candidates recommended by other sources.Appendix A to this Charter, as it may be amended from time to time by the Committee, sets forth procedures that must be followed by shareholders to submit properly a nominee candidate to the Committee (recommendations not properly submitted in accordance withAppendix A will not be considered by the Committee).

A- 3

Exhibit A

Appendix A

Procedures for Shareholders to Submit Nominee Candidates

As of April 30, 2004

A shareholder of a series of the Trust must follow the following procedures in order to submit properly a nominee recommendation for the Committee’s consideration.

The shareholder must submit any such recommendation (a “Shareholder Recommendation”) in writing to the Trust, to the attention of the Secretary, at the address of the principal executive offices of the Trust. Once each quarter, if any Shareholder Recommendations have been received by the Secretary during the quarter, the Secretary will inform the Committee of the new Shareholder Recommendations. Because the Trust does not hold annual or other regular meetings of shareholders for the purpose of electing Trustees, the Committee will accept Shareholder Recommendations on a continuous basis.

Each time that the Committee convenes to consider candidates to fill Board vacancies or newly created Board positions (a “Trustee Consideration Meeting”), the Committee will consider each Shareholder Recommendation then held by the Secretary.

The Committee may, in its discretion and at any time, convene to conduct an evaluation of validly submitted Shareholder Recommendations (each such meeting, an “Interim Evaluation”) for the purpose of determining which Shareholder Recommendations will be considered at the next Trustee Consideration Meeting.

The Shareholder Recommendation must include:

A- 4

(i) a statement in writing setting forth (A) the name, age, date of birth, business address, residence address and nationality of the person recommended by the shareholder (the “candidate”); (B) the number of shares of each series (and class) of the Trust owned of record or beneficially by the candidate, as reported to such shareholder by the candidate; (C) any other information regarding the candidate called for with respect to director nominees by paragraphs (a), (d), (e) and (f) of Item 401 of Regulation S-K (generally information regarding family relationships, business experience and involvement in certain legal proceedings) or paragraph (b) of Item 22 of Rule 14a-101 (Schedule 14A) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (or the corresponding provisions of any regulation or rule subsequently adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission or any successor agency applicable to the Trust); (D) any other information regarding the candidate that would be required to be disclosed if the candidate were a nominee in a proxy statement or other filing required to be made in connection with the election of Trustees or directors pursuant to Section 14 of the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder; and (E) whether the recommending shareholder believes that the candidate is or will be an "interested person" of the Trust (as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended) and, if not an "interested person," information regarding the candidate that will be sufficient for the Trust to make such determination;

(ii) the written and signed consent of the candidate to be named as a nominee and to serve as a Trustee if elected;

(iii) the recommending shareholder’s name as it appears on the Trust’s books;

A- 5

(iv) the number of shares of each series (and class) of the Trust owned beneficially and of record by the recommending shareholder; and

(v) a description of all arrangements or understandings between the recommending shareholder and the candidate and any other person or persons (including their names) pursuant to which the recommendation is being made by the recommending shareholder.

In addition, the Committee may require the candidate to furnish such other information as it may reasonably require or deem necessary to determine the eligibility of such candidate to serve on the Board or to satisfy applicable law.

Each Shareholder Recommendation properly submitted to the Trust will be held by the Secretary until such time as the Committee instructs the Secretary that the Committee has considered the candidate who is the subject of such Shareholder Recommendation at a Trustee Consideration Meeting or an Interim Evaluation and has decided not to nominate such candidate. All such Shareholder Recommendations shall then be filed with the records of the Trust.

B- 1

Exhibit B

MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT ~~SUBMANAGEMENT~~

DOMINI SOCIAL TRUST

MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT, dated as of ~~March 1, 2005,~~__________, 2006, by and between Domini Social ~~Investments LLC,~~Trust, a ~~Massachusetts limited liability company ("DSIL" or the "Manager"~~New York trust (the “Trust”), and Seix Advisors, a division of Trusco Capital Management, Inc., a Georgia corporation (the "Submanager"). W I T N E S S E T H: -------------------- WHEREAS, Domini Social ~~Investment~~Investments LLC (“DSI” or the “Adviser”).

WITNESSETH:

WHEREAS, the Trust ~~(the "Trust")~~ engages in business as an open-end management investment company and is registered as such under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (collectively with the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder ~~in each case as in effect from time to time,~~and any exemptive orders thereunder, the ~~"1940 Act"~~“1940 Act”); , and

WHEREAS, ~~DSIL has entered into a Management Agreement (the "Management Agreement") with~~ the Trust ~~wherein DSIL has agreed~~wishes to engage DSI to provide certain investment advisory and administrative services for the Domini Social Equity Trust and such additional series of the Trust as may be designated ~~as Domini Social Bond Fund~~from time to time onExhibit A attached hereto (the ~~"Fund"~~“Portfolios”);, and ~~WHEREAS, as permitted by Section 1 of~~DSI is willing to provide such investment advisory and administrative services for the ~~Management Agreement, DSIL wishes to subcontract some of the performance of its obligations thereunder to the Submanager, and the Submanager desires to accept such obligations~~Portfolios on the terms and conditions hereinafter set ~~forth.~~ forth; and

WHEREAS, this Agreement replaces with respect to the Domini Social Equity Trust (formerly known as the Domini Social Index Trust) the Amended and Restated Management Agreement by and between the Trust and DSI dated as of October 22, 1997, and amended and restated as of August 1, 2005 (as the same may be further amended from time to time) (the “Other Agreement”); and

WHEREAS, the Other Agreement remains in full force and effect with respect to the Domini European Social Equity Trust.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements of the parties hereto as herein set forth, the parties covenant and agree as follows: ~~A-2~~

B- 2

1. ~~APPOINTMENT~~DUTIES OF ~~SUBMANAGER. In accordance with and subject to the Management Agreement between the Trust and the Manager with respect to the Fund, the Manager hereby retains the Submanager to~~DSI.

(A) DSI shall act as the ~~Submanager~~Adviser for ~~the Fund for the period~~each Portfolio and ~~on the terms set forth in this Agreement. The Submanager accepts~~as such appointment and agrees to provide an investment program for the Fund for the compensation provided by this Agreement. 2. DUTIES OF THE SUBMANAGER. The Submanager shall provide the Fund and the Manager with such investment advice and supervision as the Manager may from time to time consider necessary for the proper supervision of such portion of the Fund's investment assets as the Manager may designate from time to time. Notwithstanding any provision of this Agreement, the Manager shall retain all rights and ultimate responsibilities to supervise and, in its discretion, conduct investment activities relating to the Fund. The Submanager shall furnish continuously an investment program and shall determine from time to time what securities shall be purchased, sold or exchanged and what portion of the assets of ~~the Fund allocated by the Manager to the Submanager~~each Portfolio shall be held uninvested, subject always to the restrictions of the ~~Trust's Second Amended and Restated~~Trust’s Declaration of Trust, dated June 7, 1989, ~~as last amended~~ and ~~restated on May 15, 2001, and By-laws,~~By-Laws, as each may be amended and restated from time to time (respectively, the ~~"Declaration"~~“Declaration” and the ~~"By-Laws"~~“By-Laws”), the provisions of the 1940 Act, and the then-current registration statement of the Trust with respect to the Fund and, subject further, to the Submanager notifying the Manager in advance of the Submanager's intention to purchase any securities except insofar as the requirement for such notification may be waived or limited by the Manager, it being understood that the Submanager shall be responsible for compliance with any restrictions imposed A-3 in writing by the Manager from time to time in order to facilitate compliance with the above-mentioned restrictions and such other restrictions as the Manager may determine. Further, the Manager or the Trustees of the Trust may at any time, upon written notice to the Submanager, suspend or restrict the right of the Submanager to determine what securities shall be purchased or sold on behalf of the Fund and what portion, if any, of the assets of the Fund allocated by the Manager to the Submanager shall be held uninvested.each Portfolio. The ~~Submanager~~Adviser shall also ~~as requested,~~ make recommendations ~~to the Manager~~ as to the manner in which ~~proxies,~~ voting rights, rights to consent to corporate action and any other rights pertaining to ~~the Fund's~~each Portfolio’s portfolio securities shall be exercised. Should the Board of Trustees of the Trust ~~or the Manager~~ at any time, however, make any definite determination as to an investment policy applicable to ~~the Fund~~a Portfolio and notify the ~~Submanager~~Adviser thereof in writing, the ~~Submanager~~Adviser shall be bound by such determination for the period, if any, specified in such notice or until similarly notified that such determination has been revoked. The ~~Submanager~~Adviser shall take, on behalf of ~~the Fund,~~each Portfolio, all actions which it deems necessary to implement the investment policies determined as provided above and, in particular, to place all orders for the purchase or sale of securities for the ~~Fund's~~Portfolio’s account with the brokers or dealers selected by it, and to that end the ~~Submanager~~Adviser is authorized as the agent of the ~~Fund~~Portfolio to give instructions to the custodian or any subcustodian of the ~~Fund~~Portfolio as to deliveries of securities and payments of cash for the account of the ~~Fund. The Submanager will advise the Manager on the same day it gives any such instructions.~~Portfolio. In connection with the selection of such brokers or dealers and the placing of such orders, brokers or dealers may be selected who also provide brokerage and research services (as those terms are defined in Section 28(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) to the Portfolios and/or the other accounts over which the Adviser, any subadviser, submanager or respective “affiliated person” thereof exercises investment discretion. The Adviser is authorized to pay a broker or dealer who provides such brokerage and research services a commission for executing a portfolio transaction for a Portfolio which is in excess of the amount of commission another broker or dealer would have charged for effecting that transaction if the Adviser determines in good faith that such amount of commission is reasonable in relation to the value of the brokerage and research services provided by such broker or dealer. This determination may be viewed in terms of either that particular transaction or the overall

B- 3

responsibilities which the Adviser and any “affiliated person” of the Adviser have with respect to accounts over which they exercise investment discretion. In making purchases or sales of securities or other property for the account of a Portfolio, the Adviser may deal with itself or with the Trustees of the Trust or the Trust’s underwriter or distributor to the extent such actions are permitted by the 1940 Act. In providing the services and assuming the obligations set forth herein, the Adviser may subject to the requirements of the 1940 Act employ at its own expense, or may request that the Trust employ at each Portfolio’s expense, one or more subadvisers or submanagers;provided that in each case the Adviser shall supervise the activities of each subadviser. Any agreement between the Adviser and a subadviser shall be subject to the renewal, termination and amendment provisions applicable to this Agreement. Any agreement by the Trust on behalf of a Portfolio and a subadviser may be terminated by the Adviser at any time on not more than 60 days’ nor less than 30 days’ written notice to the Trust and the subadviser.

(B) Subject to the direction and control of the Board of Trustees of the Portfolio, DSI shall perform such administrative and management services as may from time to time be reasonably requested by the Trust with respect to each Portfolio, which shall include without limitation:

(1) maintaining office facilities (which may be in the office of DSI or an “affiliated person” of DSI) and furnishing clerical services necessary for maintaining the organization of the Trust and each Portfolio and for performing the administrative and management functions herein set forth;

(2) arranging, if desired by the Trust, for directors, officers or employees of the Adviser to serve as Trustees, officers or agents of the Trust if duly elected or appointed to such positions and subject to their individual consent and to any limitations imposed by the law;

(3) supervising the overall administration of the Trust and each Portfolio, including negotiation of contracts and fees with and the monitoring of performance and billings of the Portfolio’s transfer agent, custodian and other independent contractors or agents;

B- 4

(4) overseeing (with advice of the Trust’s counsel), the preparation of and, if applicable, filing all documents required for compliance by the Trust and each Portfolio with applicable laws and regulations, including registration statements, semi-annual and annual reports to investors, proxy statements and tax returns;

(5) preparing agendas and supporting documents for and minutes of meetings of Trustees, committees of Trustees and investors;

(6) arranging for maintenance of books and records of each Portfolio;

(7) maintaining telephone coverage to respond to investor inquiries regarding matters to which this Agreement pertains to which transfer agents are unable to respond;

(8) providing reports and assistance regarding each Portfolio’s compliance with securities and tax laws and investment objective and restrictions;

(9) arranging for dissemination of yield and other performance information to newspapers and tracking services;

(10) arranging for and preparing annual renewals for fidelity bond and errors and omissions insurance coverage;

(11) developing a budget for each Portfolio, establishing the rate of expense accruals and arranging for the payment of all fixed and management expenses; and

(12) answering questions from the general public, the media and investors in each Portfolio regarding (a) the securities holdings of the Portfolio; (b) any limits in which the Portfolio invests; (c) the social investment philosophy of the Portfolio; and (d) the proxy voting philosophy and shareholder activism philosophy of the Portfolio.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, DSI shall not be deemed to have assumed any duties with respect to, and shall not be responsible for, the distribution of beneficial interests in any Portfolio, nor shall DSI be

B- 5

deemed to have assumed or have any responsibility with respect to functions specifically assumed by any transfer agent, fund accounting agent or custodian of the Trust or any Portfolio. In providing administrative and management services as set forth herein, DSI may, at its own expense, employ one or more subadministrators;provided that DSI shall remain fully responsible for the performance of all administrative and management duties set forth herein and shall supervise the activities of each subadministrator.

2. ALLOCATION OF CHARGES AND EXPENSES.

DSI shall furnish at its own expense all necessary services, facilities and personnel in connection with its responsibilities under Section 1 above. Except as provided in the foregoing sentence, it is understood that the Trust will pay from the assets of each Portfolio all of its own expenses allocable to that Portfolio including, without limitation, organization costs of the Portfolio; compensation of Trustees who are not “interested persons” of the Trust; governmental fees, including but not limited to Securities and Exchange Commission fees and state “blue sky” fees, if any; interest; loan commitment fees; taxes; brokerage fees and commissions; membership dues in industry and professional associations; fees and expenses of auditors and accountants, legal counsel and any transfer agent, distributor, shareholder servicing agent, recordkeeper, registrar or dividend disbursing agent of the Trust or the Portfolio; expenses relating to the issuance and redemption of beneficial interests in the Portfolio and servicing investor accounts; expenses of preparing, typesetting, printing and mailing: registration statements for regulatory purposes and for distribution to current investors, investor reports, notices, proxy statements and reports to governmental officers and commissions and to investors in the Portfolio; expenses connected with the execution, recording and settlement of security transactions; insurance premiums; fees and expenses of the custodian for all services to the Portfolio, including safekeeping of funds and securities and maintaining required books and accounts; expenses of calculating the net asset value of the Portfolio (including but not limited to the fees of independent pricing services); expenses connected with maintaining the Trust’s existence as a New York trust; expenses of meetings of the Portfolio’s investors; and such non-recurring or extraordinary expenses as may arise, including those relating to actions, suits or proceedings to which the Trust on behalf of the Portfolio may be party and the legal

B- 6

obligation which the Trust may have to indemnify its Trustees and officers with respect thereto.

3. COMPENSATION OF DSI.

For the services to be rendered and facilities provided by DSI hereunder, the Trust will pay DSI from the assets of each Portfolio a management fee accrued daily and payable monthly at an annual rate equal to the rate set forth opposite the Portfolio’s name onAnnex A attached hereto of the Portfolio’s average daily net assets for the Portfolio’s then current fiscal year. The Adviser shall pay any applicable fees to the subadviser(s) on a Portfolio’s behalf. If DSI provides services hereunder for less than the whole of any period specified in this Section 3, the compensation to DSI shall be accordingly adjusted and prorated.

4. COVENANTS OF DSI.

DSI agrees that it will not deal with itself, or with the Trustees of the Trust or the Trust’s principal underwriter or distributor, if any, as principals in making purchases or sales of securities or other property for the account of a Portfolio, except as permitted by the 1940 Act, will not take a long or short position in beneficial interests of a Portfolio, except as permitted by the Declaration, and will comply with all other provisions of the Declaration and By-Laws and the then-current registration statement applicable to each Portfolio relative to DSI and its directors and officers.

5. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY OF DSI.

DSI shall not be liable for any error of judgment or mistake of law or for any loss arising out of any investment or for any act or omission in the execution of securities transactions for a Portfolio, except for willful misfeasance, bad faith or gross negligence in the performance of its duties, or by reason of reckless disregard of its obligations and duties hereunder. As used in this Section 5, the term “DSI” shall include directors, officers and employees of DSI as well as DSI itself.

6. ACTIVITIES OF DSI.

The services of DSI to the Portfolios are not to be deemed to be exclusive, DSI being free to render investment advisory,

B- 7

administrative and/or other services to others. It is understood that Trustees, officers and investors of the Trust are or may be or may become interested in DSI as directors, officers, employees or otherwise and that directors, officers and employees of DSI are or may become similarly interested in the Trust and that DSI may be or may become interested in the Trust as an investor or otherwise.

7. DURATION, TERMINATION AND AMENDMENTS OF THIS AGREEMENT.

This Agreement shall become effective as to a Portfolio as of day and year set forth opposite such Portfolio’s name onAppendix A attached hereto, shall govern the relations between the parties hereto thereafter and shall remain in force for a period of two years from its effectiveness, on which date it will terminate unless its continuance with respect to the Portfolio is “specifically approved at least annually” (a) by the vote of a majority of the Trustees of the Trust who are not “interested persons” of the Trust or of DSI at a meeting specifically called for the purpose of voting on such approval and (b) by the Board of Trustees of the Trust or by “vote of a majority of the outstanding voting securities” of the Portfolio.

This Agreement may be terminated at any time with respect to a Portfolio without the payment of any penalty by the Trustees or by the “vote of a majority of the outstanding voting securities” of the Portfolio, or by DSI, in each case on not more than 60 days’ nor less than 30 days’ written notice to the other party. This Agreement shall automatically terminate in the event of its “assignment.”

This Agreement may be amended with respect to a Portfolio only if such amendment is approved by the “vote of a majority of the outstanding voting securities” of the Portfolio (except for any such amendment as may be effected in the absence of such approval without violating the 1940 Act).

The terms “specifically approved at least annually,” “vote of a majority of the outstanding voting securities,” “assignment,” “affiliated person” and “interested persons,” when used in this Agreement, shall have the respective meanings specified in, and shall be construed in a manner consistent with, the 1940 Act, subject, however, to such exemptions as may be granted by the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Act.

B- 8

8. GOVERNING LAW.

This Agreement shall be construed and the provisions hereof interpreted under and in accordance with the laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.

Each party acknowledges and agrees that all obligations of the Trust under this Agreement are binding only with respect to the applicable Portfolio; that any liability of the Trust under this Agreement, or in connection with the transactions contemplated herein, shall be discharged only out of the assets of that Portfolio and no other Portfolio or series of the Trust shall be liable with respect to this Agreement or in connection with the transactions contemplated herein.

The undersigned officer of the Trust has executed this Agreement not individually, but as an officer under the Declaration and the obligations of this Agreement are not binding upon any of the Trustees, officers or holders of beneficial interests in the Trust individually.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed and delivered in their names and on their behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, all as of the day and year first above written.

DOMINI SOCIAL TRUST, on behalf of itself and its series listed onAppendix A attached hereto

By: ____________________________

Title:___________________________

DOMINI SOCIAL INVESTMENTS LLC

By: _____________________________

Title: ___________________________

B- 9

Exhibit B

Appendix A

Portfolio

CompensationRate

EffectiveDate

Domini Social Equity Trust

0.30% of the first $2 billion of net assets managed

0.29% of the next $1 billion of net assets managed

0.28% of net assets managed in excess of $3 billion

_______, 2006

C- 1

ExhibitC

Information Regarding Other Funds Submanaged by

Wellington Management Company, LLP

with a Similar Investment Objective to the

Domini Social Equity Trust

Wellington Management acts as subadviser to two US registered investment companies in its Core US Intersection approach. Those funds range in size from approximately $400 million to approximately $1.5 billion and have effective subadvisory fee rates ranging from 0.174% to 0.226%. The funds are part of a family of funds for which Wellington Management subadvises in excess of $81 billion. Wellington Management also acts as subadviser to two commingled investment vehicles which are not registered investment companies in its Core US Intersection approach. Those vehicles range in size from approximately $103 million to approximately $140 million and have effective subadvisory fee rates ranging from 0.409% to 0.520%. Wellington Management does not currently act as subadviser to any US registered investment companies in its Core US Quantitative approach.

The Core US Intersection approach differs from the Core US Quantitative approach that Wellington Management will use to manage the Domini Social Equity Trust. The Core US Intersection approach uses both quantitative ranks (including value and momentum factors) and Wellington Management’s global industry analysts’ ratings in combination with Wellington Management's quantitative portfolio construction techniques. The Core US Quantitative approach Wellington Management will use to manage the Domini Social Equity Trust will rely only on Wellington Management’s quantitative ranking to assess the relative attractiveness of the stocks in the investment universe and will not utilize Wellington Management’s analysts’ ratings, as is the case in the Core US Intersection approach. In addition, Wellington Management will limit the universe of securities in which the Domini Social Equity Trust may invest to the universe of securities that have been approved by Domini based on its social and environmental analysis.

The similarities between the Core US Intersection and Core US Quantitative approaches include the use of quantitative stock rankings to rank the relative attractiveness of stocks in the investment universe

C- 2

based on value and momentum factors, and the use of quantitative portfolio construction techniques to manage overall portfolio risk.

Information contained in this Exhibit C has been provided by Wellington Management.

D- 1

Exhibit D

SUBMANAGEMENT AGREEMENT

SUBMANAGEMENT AGREEMENT, dated as of______________, 2006 by and between Domini Social Investments LLC, a Massachusetts limited liability company (“Domini” or the “Manager”), and Wellington Management Company, LLP (“Wellington Management” or the “Submanager”).

WITNESSETH:

WHEREAS,the Domini Social Trust (the “Master Trust”) engages in business as an open-end management investment company and is registered as such under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (collectively with the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, the “1940 Act”); and

WHEREAS,Domini has entered into a Management Agreement (the “Management Agreement”) with the Master Trust wherein Domini has agreed to serve as Manager to the series of the Master Trust designated as the Domini Social Equity Trust (the “Master Fund”); and

WHEREAS, Domini desires to retain the Submanager to furnish it with portfolio investment advisory services in connection with Domini’s investment advisory activities on behalf of the Master Fund, and the Submanager is willing to furnish such services to Domini;

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements of the parties hereto as herein set forth, the parties covenant and agree as follows:

APPOINTMENT OF WELLINGTON.

In accordance with and subject to the Management Agreement between the Master Trust and the Manager with respect to the Master Fund, the Manager hereby retains Wellington Management to act as

D- 2

the Submanager for the Master Fund for the period and on the terms set forth in this Agreement. The Submanager accepts such appointment and agrees to provide an investment program for the Master Fund in accordance with the terms of this Agreement and applicable law and for the compensation provided by this Agreement.

The Submanager is hereby authorized to engage any of its affiliates to provide the Submanager with investment management or advisory and related services with respect to the Submanager performing its obligations under this Agreement. The Submanager shall remain liable to the Manager for performance of the Submanager’s obligations under this Agreement, and for the acts and omissions of such affiliates and the Manager shall not be responsible for any fees which any affiliate may charge to the Submanager in connection with such services.

DUTIES OF THE SUBMANAGER.

The Submanager is hereby employed and authorized to select portfolio securities for investment by the portion of the assets of the Master Fund as the Manager may designate from time to time (the “Master Fund Account”), to determine to purchase and sell securities of the Master Fund Account, and upon making any purchase or sale decision, to place orders for the execution of such portfolio transactions in accordance with this Agreement. Notwithstanding any provision of this Agreement, the Manager shall retain all rights and ultimate responsibilities to withdraw assets from the Master Fund Account and to supervise and, in its discretion, conduct investment activities relating to the Master Fund.

The Submanager shall furnish continuously an investment program and shall determine from time to time what securities shall be purchased, sold or exchanged and what portion of the assets of the Master Fund Account shall be held uninvested, subject always to the restrictions of the Master Trust’s Second Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust, dated June 7, 1989, as amended and restated as of May 15, 2001, as amended, and By-laws, as each may be amended from time to time (respectively, the “Declaration” and the “By-Laws”), the provisions of the 1940 Act, and the then-current registration statement of the Master Trust with respect to the Master Fund. The

D- 3

Manager agrees to provide copies of any amendments to the Declaration of Trust, By-Laws or Master Fund’s registration statement to the Submanager. Should the Board of Trustees of the Master Trust or the Manager at any time, however, make any definite determination as to an investment policy applicable to the Master Fund and the Manager notifies the Submanager thereof in writing, the Submanager shall be bound by such determination for the period, if any, specified in such notice or until similarly notified that such determination has been revoked.

The Submanager shall take, on behalf of the Master Fund, all actions which it deems necessary to implement the investment policies determined as provided above and, in particular, to place all orders for the purchase or sale of securities for the Master Fund Account with the brokers or dealers selected by it, and to that end the Submanager is authorized as the agent of the Master Fund to give instructions to the custodian or any subcustodian of the Master Fund as to deliveries of securities and payments of cash for the Master Fund Account. In connection with the selection of such brokers or dealers and the placing of such orders, and subject to the primary objective of obtaining the best available prices and execution, brokers or dealers may be selected who also provide brokerage and research services (as those terms are defined in Section 28(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) to the Master Fund and/or the other accounts over which the Submanager, the Manager or a respective ~~"affiliated person"~~“affiliated person” thereof exercises investment discretion. The Submanager shall not be obligated to solicit competitive bids for each transaction it enters into on behalf of the Master Fund and is authorized to pay a broker or dealer who provides ~~A-4~~ such brokerage and research services a commission for executing a portfolio transaction for the Master Fund which is in excess of the amount of commission another broker or dealer would have charged for effecting that transaction if the Submanager determines in good faith that such amount of commission is reasonable in relation to the value of the brokerage and research services provided by such broker or dealer. This determination may be viewed in terms of either that particular transaction or the overall responsibilities which the Submanager, the Manager and any ~~"affiliated person"~~“affiliated person” thereof have with respect to accounts over which they exercise investment ~~discretion. The Trustees~~discretion notwithstanding the fact that the Master Fund may not be the direct or exclusive beneficiary of ~~the Trust shall periodically review the commissions paid by the Fund to determine if the commissions paid over representative periods of time were reasonable in relation to the benefits to the Fund.~~any such services. In

D- 4

making purchases or sales of securities or other property for the ~~account of the~~Master Fund Account, the Submanager may deal with itself or with the Trustees of the Master Trust or the ~~Fund's~~Master Fund’s underwriter or distributor to the extent such actions are permitted by the 1940 Act. The Board of Trustees of the Master Trust, in its discretion, may instruct the Submanager to effect all or a portion of its securities transactions with one or more brokers and/or dealers selected by the Board of Trustees if it determines that the use of such brokers and/or dealers is in the best interest of the Master Fund.

The Submanager shall not be responsible for filing class action proofs of claim or the voting of proxies on behalf of the Master Fund.

DUTIES OF THE MANAGER.

The Manager shall, in accordance with the terms of the Management Agreement, assume responsibility for voting the proxies of the securities held by the Master Fund.

The Manager shall screen the securities submitted to it by the Submanager according to the social and environmental criteria developed for the Master Fund by the Manager. The Manager shall notify the Submanager of the results of each screening via email, telecopy or mail to the addresses the Submanager shall furnish in writing to the Manager from time to time. Any such notice shall be deemed to have been duly given or made and to have become effective (i) if delivered by hand, overnight courier, email or telecopy to the person identified above (or to such other person as the Submanager shall have identified to the Manager in writing), at the time of the receipt thereof by such person and (ii) if sent by registered or certified first-class mail, postage prepaid, on the third business day following the mailing thereof.

The Submanager shall not purchase any securities for the Master Fund that do not meet the social and environmental criteria applied by the Manager. If the Manager at any time determines that a security in which the Master Fund is invested does not meet such social and environmental criteria, the Manager shall so notify the Submanager in accordance with the notification procedures outlined above and the Submanager shall, within ninety (90) days of the receipt

D- 5

of such notification, sell such security from the Master Fund Account. The Submanager shall not be responsible for compliance with any notice provided by the Manager under this Section 3 if such notice is not delivered by the Manager in accordance with the provisions of this Section 3. ~~ALLOCATION OF CHARGES AND EXPENSES.~~

ALLOCATION OF CHARGES AND EXPENSES.

The Submanager shall furnish at its own expense all necessary services, facilities and personnel in connection with its responsibilities under Section 2 above. Except as provided in the foregoing sentence, it is understood that the Master Trust will pay all of its own expenses and the expenses allocated to the Master Fund including, without limitation, organization costs of the ~~Trust;~~Master Fund; compensation of Trustees who are not ~~"interested persons"~~“interested persons” of the Master Trust; governmental fees; interest charges; loan commitment fees; taxes; membership dues in industry associations allocable to the ~~Trust;~~Master Fund; fees and expenses of independent auditors, legal counsel and any transfer agent, distributor, registrar or ~~A-5~~ dividend disbursing agent of the ~~Trust;~~Master Fund; expenses relating to the issuance and redemption of ~~shares of~~ beneficial ~~interest of~~interests in the Master Fund and servicing ~~shareholder~~investor accounts; expenses of preparing, typesetting, printing and mailing ~~prospectuses, statements of additional information, shareholder~~investor reports, notices, proxy statements and reports to governmental officers and commissions and to ~~shareholders of~~investors in the Master Fund; expenses connected with the execution, recording and settlement of security transactions; insurance premiums; fees and expenses of the custodian for all services to the Master Fund, including safekeeping of funds and securities and maintaining required books and accounts; expenses of calculating the net asset value of the Master Fund (including but not limited to the fees of independent pricing ~~services);~~services; expenses of meetings of the ~~Fund's shareholders;~~Master Fund’s investors; and such non-recurring or extraordinary expenses as may arise, including those relating to actions, suits or proceedings to which the Master Trust on behalf of the Master Fund may be a party and the legal obligation which the Master Trust may have to indemnify its Trustees and officers with respect thereto. ~~4. COMPENSATION OF THE SUBMANAGER. (a) From~~

D- 6

COMPENSATION OF THE SUBMANAGER.

For the ~~date of this Agreement~~services to ~~but not including July 29, 2005 or, if earlier, the date on which this Agreement is approved~~be rendered by the ~~shareholders of the Fund in accordance with the 1940 Act,~~Submanager hereunder, the Manager shall pay to the Submanager ~~out~~a fee computed as specified in theSchedule A which is attached hereto and made a part of ~~the management fee it receives from the Trust out of the assets of the Fund, and only~~this Agreement. Such compensation shall be paid to the ~~extent thereof,~~Submanager at the end of each month, and calculated by applying a ~~subadvisory~~daily rate, based on the annual percentage rates as specified in the attachedSchedule A, to the assets. The fee ~~accrued daily and paid monthly at an annual rate equal to 0.20% of~~calculation shall be based on the Master Fund’s average daily net assets of the Fund allocated to the Submanager. (b) If this Agreement is approved by the shareholders of the Fund in accordance with the 1940 Act then, from and after the date of such approval, the Manager shall pay to the Submanager out of the management fee it receives from the Trust out of the assets of the Fund, and only to the extent thereof, a subadvisory fee, accrued daily and paid monthly, at the A-6 following annual rates of the Fund's average daily net assets during the month: 0.40% per year on the first $10 million managed 0.35% per year on the next $10 million managed 0.30% per year on the next $30 million managed 0.25% per year on the next $30 million managed 0.20% per year on the next $120 million managed 0.15% per year on the next $300 million managed 0.10% per year on the next $500 million managed 0.05% per year on amounts over $1 billion (c) Notwithstanding clauses (a) and (b) of this section, the subadvisory fees payable by the Manager hereunder shall not exceed $180,000 for the period from the date of this Agreement through March 1, 2006. (d) Subject to the approval of this Agreement by the shareholders of the Fund in accordance with the 1940 Act, the Manager will pay to the Submanager an additional one-time fee equal to $25,000 as consideration for the Submanager's services provided to the Fund from and after the approval of this Agreement by the shareholders of the Fund. Such amount, if payable, will be paid by the Manager to the Submanager after this Agreement has been approved by the shareholders of the Fund in accordance with the 1940 Act. Such amount, if paid, will be refunded by the Submanager to the Manager if the Submanager terminates this Agreement prior to December 31, 2005.month involved. If the shareholders of the Fund do not approve this Agreement in accordance with the 1940 Act, the Submanager will not be entitled to such additional amount and the Manager's obligation to pay such amount will terminate. (e) If the SubmanagerWellington serves as Submanager for less than the whole of any period specified in this Section 4,5, the compensation ~~of the Submanager,~~to Wellington, as Submanager, shall be ~~accordingly adjusted and~~ prorated. ~~A-7 5. COVENANTS OF THE SUBMANAGER.~~

COVENANTS OF THE SUBMANAGER.

The Submanager agrees that it will not deal with itself, or with the Trustees of the Master Trust or the ~~Trust's~~Master Fund’s principal underwriter or distributor, if any, as principals in making purchases or sales of securities or other property, except as permitted by the 1940 Act, ~~will not take a long or short position in shares of beneficial interest of the Fund, except as permitted by the Declaration,~~ and will comply with all ~~other~~ provisions of the Declaration and ~~ByLaws~~By-Laws and the then-current registration statement of the Master Trust applicable to the ~~Fund relative to the Submanager and its directors and officers.~~Master Fund. The Submanager shall not act as custodian for the Master Fund or take ~~or have~~ possession of any assets thereof. 6.

7.LIMITATION OF LIABILITY OF THE SUBMANAGER.

The Submanager shall not be liable for any error of judgment or mistake of law or for any loss arising out of any investment or for any act or omission in the execution of securities transactions for the Master Fund, except for willful misfeasance, bad faith or gross negligence in the performance of its duties, or by reason of reckless disregard of its obligations and duties hereunder. As used in this Section 6,7, the term ~~"Submanager"~~“Submanager” shall include directors, partners, officers and employees of the Submanager as well as the Submanager itself. The Master Trust is expressly made a third party beneficiary of this Agreement and may enforce any obligations of the Submanager under this Agreement and recover directly from the Submanager for any liability the Submanager may have hereunder. ~~7. ACTIVITIES OF THE SUBMANAGER.~~

D- 7

ACTIVITIES OF THE SUBMANAGER.

The services of the Submanager to the Master Fund are not to be deemed to be exclusive, the Submanager and its affiliates being free to render investment advisory, administrative and/or other services to ~~others.~~others (“Affiliated Accounts”). The Manager agrees that the Submanager or its affiliates may give advice or exercise investment responsibility and take such other action with respect to other Affiliated Accounts which may differ from advice given or the timing or nature of action taken with respect to the Master Fund Account,provided that the Submanager acts in good faith, andprovided, further, that it is the Submanager’s policy to allocate, within its reasonable discretion and consistent with its fiduciary obligations to the Master Fund and the Affiliated Accounts, investment opportunities to the Master Fund Account over a period of time on a fair and equitable basis relative to the Affiliated Accounts, taking into account the investment objectives and policies of the Master Fund Account and any specific investment restrictions or other factors applicable thereto. The Manager acknowledges that as permitted by applicable law one or more of the Affiliated Accounts may at any time hold, acquire, increase, decrease, dispose of or otherwise deal with positions in investments in which the Master Fund Account may have an interest from time to time, whether in transactions which may involve the Master Fund Account or otherwise. The Submanager shall have no obligation to acquire for the Master Fund Account a position in any investment which any Affiliated Account may acquire, and the Manager shall have no first refusal, coinvestment or other rights in respect of any such investment, either for the Master Fund Account or otherwise. It is ~~A-8~~ understood that Trustees and officers of the Master Trust and ~~shareholders~~investors of the Master Fund or the Manager are or may be or may become interested in the Submanager as directors, partners, officers, employees or otherwise and that directors, partners, officers and employees of the Submanager are or may become similarly interested in the Master Trust or the Master Fund or the Manager and that the Submanager may be or may become interested in the Master Trust or the Master Fund as ~~a shareholder~~an investor or otherwise. ~~8. CONFIDENTIAL RELATIONSHIP.~~

CONFIDENTIAL RELATIONSHIP.

All information and recommendations furnished by the Submanager shall be regarded as confidential and for use only by ~~DSIL~~the

D- 8

Manager or such persons as ~~DSIL~~the Manager may designate, and only in connection with the management of the Master Fund. The Submanager shall regard as confidential all information furnished to it hereunder concerning the affairs of the Master Fund and ~~DSIL.~~the Manager. All confidential information provided by a party hereto shall be used by the other party hereto solely for the purpose of rendering or obtaining services pursuant to this Agreement and, except as may be required in carrying out this Agreement, shall not be disclosed to any third party without the prior written consent of such providing party. The foregoing shall not be applicable to any information that is publicly available when provided or thereafter becomes publicly available other than through a breach of this Agreement, known to the receiving party prior to entering into this Agreement, is received from some other source not a party to this Agreement, or is required to be disclosed by or to any regulatory authority, any auditor of the parties hereto, or by judicial or administrative process or otherwise by applicable law. Throughout the life of this Agreement, unless notified otherwise in writing by DSIL, the Submanager is authorized to include DSIL's name on a publicly available list of its current clients. 9. RECEIPT OF DISCLOSURE DOCUMENT. DSIL

10.

RECEIPT OF DISCLOSURE DOCUMENT.

The Manager acknowledges that it has received a copy of the ~~Trusco Capital Management~~Submanager’s disclosure document under Rule 204-3 of the ~~A-9~~ Investment Advisers Act of 1940 at least 48 hours prior to entering into this Agreement. ~~10. REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES.~~

11.

REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES.

Each party represents and warrants that: (a) the person(s) executing this Agreement on behalf of the party has full power and authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the party and (b) the ~~party's~~party’s execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement will be binding upon the party in accordance with the terms hereof, and will not violate any obligations by which the party is bound, whether arising by contract, operation of law or otherwise. ~~11. DURATION, TERMINATION AND AMENDMENTS OF THIS AGREEMENT.~~ The Manager represents, warrants and agrees that it will deliver to the Submanager a true and complete copy of the Master Fund’s current registration statement as effective from time to time and such other documents or instruments governing the investments of the Master Fund Account.

D- 9

12.

USE OF NAMES.

Neither party shall use the name, trademark or trade name of the other party or any of its affiliates or refer to the existence of this Agreement in any advertising, promotional or other material, whether in written, electronic or other form, distributed to any unaffiliated third party without obtaining specific prior written approval of the non-disclosing party; provided, that such consent shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed.

13.

DURATION, TERMINATION AND AMENDMENTS OF THIS AGREEMENT.

This Agreement shall become effective as of the ~~day~~date and year first above written, shall govern the relations between the parties hereto thereafter and shall remain in force ~~until March 1, 2007,~~for two years, on which date it will terminate unless its continuance ~~after March 1, 2007~~thereafter is ~~"specifically~~“specifically approved at least ~~annually"~~annually” (a) by the vote of a majority of the Trustees of the ~~Trust~~Master Fund who are not ~~"interested persons"~~“interested persons” of the Master Trust or of ~~DSIL~~Domini or the Submanager at a meeting specifically called for the purpose of voting on such approval and (b) by the Board of Trustees of the Master Trust or by ~~"vote~~“vote of a majority of the outstanding voting ~~securities"~~securities” of the Master Fund. ~~Notwithstanding~~However, if the ~~immediately preceding sentence~~investors of ~~this Section 11, this~~the Master Fund fail to approve the Agreement ~~shall terminate on July 29, 2005 unless on or before such date this Agreement is approved~~as provided herein, the Submanager may continue to serve hereunder in the manner and to the extent permitted by the ~~shareholders of the Fund in accordance with the~~ 1940 Act.

This Agreement may be terminated at any time without the payment of any penalty by (i) the Trustees of the Master Trust, (ii) the ~~"vote~~“vote of a majority of the outstanding voting ~~securities"~~securities” of the Master Fund or (iii) ~~DSIL~~Domini with the prior consent of the Trustees of the Master Trust, in each case on not more than 60 ~~days'~~days’ nor less than 30 ~~days'~~days’ written notice to the other party. ~~Subject to Section 4(d) of~~ ~~A-10 this Agreement, this~~This Agreement may be terminated at any time without the payment of any penalty by the Submanager on not less than 90 ~~days'~~days’ written notice to the Manager and the Trustees of the Master Trust. This Agreement shall automatically terminate in the event of its ~~"assignment."~~ “assignment.”

This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties and, except as otherwise permitted by applicable law, may be

D- 10

amended only if such amendment is approved by the parties hereto, the Trustees of the Master Trust and the ~~"vote~~“vote of a majority of the outstanding voting ~~securities"~~securities” of the ~~Fund (except for any such amendment as~~Master Fund.

The Agreement may be ~~effected~~executed simultaneously in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the ~~absence of such vote without violating the 1940 Act or any exemptive order granted thereunder).~~ same instrument.

The terms ~~"specifically~~“specifically approved at least annually,~~" "vote~~” “vote of a majority of the outstanding voting securities,~~" "assignment," "affiliated person"~~” “assignment,” “affiliated person” and ~~"interested~~“interested persons,"” when used in this Agreement, shall have the respective meanings specified in, and shall be construed in a manner consistent with, the 1940 Act, subject, however, to such exemptions as may be granted by the Securities and Exchange Commission under the 1940 Act. ~~12. GOVERNING LAW.~~

14.

GOVERNING LAW.

This Agreement shall be construed and the provisions thereof interpreted under and in accordance with the laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts; provided, however, that nothing herein will be construed in a manner inconsistent with the 1940 Act, the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 or any rules or regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission thereunder. ~~A-11~~

15.

NOTICES.

Any notice, advice or report to be given pursuant to the Agreement (other than pursuant to Section 3 hereof) shall be deemed to have been duly given or made as of the date delivered or transmitted, and shall be effective upon receipt, if delivered personally, mailed by registered or certified mail (postage prepaid, return receipt requested) to the following addresses, or sent by electronic transmission to the telecopier number specified below:

To the Submanager at:

	Wellington Management Company, LLP
	75 State Street
	Boston, Massachusetts 02109

D- 11

Attention: Legal Services Department

Telecopier No: 617-790-7760

Email: rtoner@wellington.com

To the Manager at:

	Domini Social Investments LLC
	536 Broadway, 7th Floor
	New York, New York 10012-3915
	Attention: President
	Telecopier No: 212-217-1101
	Email: claible@domini.com

IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed and delivered in their names and on their behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, all as of the day and year first above written. ~~SEIX ADVISORS A division of TRUSCO CAPITAL~~

WELLINGTON MANAGEMENT ~~INC. By: /s/ Robin J. Shulman ----------------------------------~~

COMPANY, LLP

By:

Title: ~~Compliance Officer and Managing Director~~

DOMINI SOCIAL INVESTMENTS LLC

By: ~~/s/ Amy L. Domini -----------------~~

Title: ~~CEO~~

Acknowledged:

DOMINI SOCIAL ~~INVESTMENT~~ TRUST, On

on behalf of Domini Social ~~Bond Fund~~ Equity Trust

By: ~~/s/ Carole M. Laible --------------------~~ _____________________________________

Title: ~~Treasurer~~ ~~B-1~~

D- 12

Exhibit ~~B --------- Information Regarding Mutual Funds Managed by Seix Advisors,~~D

Schedule A

Pursuant to Section 5, the ~~fixed-income division of Trusco Capital Management, Inc.~~ Manager shall pay the Submanager compensation at the following annual rates:

Fees After Contractual Waivers Fees (Annual Net Assets (Annual rates rates based as
	0.30% of ~~based on on Fund 3/31/05(1)~~the first $250 million of net ~~assets)~~assets managed
	0.25% of the next $750 million of net ~~assets)~~ STI Classic $297,713,000 0.25% 0.25% Institutional Core Bond Fund STI Classic Investment $644,605,000 0.74% 0.74% Grade Bond Fund STI Classic $55,152,000 0.25% 0.25% Institutional Intermediate Bond Fund STI Classic Variable $16,298,000 0.74% 0.48% Trust Investment Grade Bond Fund STI Classic $64,097,000 0.45% 0.35% Institutional Total Return Bond Fund STI Classic $63,982,000 0.50% 0.40% Institutional High Quality Bond Fund assets managed
	0.225% of net assets managed in excess of $1 billion

~~(1) Net assets as of 3/31/2005 are rounded to the nearest thousand. - ----------------------------------------------------- 100%~~

Printed on 50% recycled, 20% post consumer waste ~~processed chlorine free, printed with soy based inks.~~ [Domini Social Investments Logo] P.O. Box 9785, Providence, RI 02940-9785 THREE EASY WAYS TO VOTE YOUR PROXY Read the Proxy Statement and have the proxy card at hand. TELEPHONE: Call 1-800-690-6903 and follow the simple instructions. INTERNET: Go to www.proxyweb.com/domini and follow the online directions. MAIL: Vote, sign, date, and return your proxy by mail. If you vote by Telephone or on the Internet, do not mail your proxy. NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS DOMINI SOCIAL BOND FUND To be held Tuesday, June 28, 2005 The undersigned, revoking prior proxies, hereby appoints Amy L. Domini, Adam Kanzer, Carole M. Laible, and Steven D. Lydenberg, and each of them, proxies with several powers of substitution, to vote for the undersigned at the Special Meeting of Shareholders of Domini Social Bond Fund on June 28, 2005, as set forth on the reverse side of this proxy card, or at any adjournment thereof, upon the following matter, as described in the Notice of Special Meeting and accompanying Proxy Statement, which have been received by the undersigned. When properly executed, this proxy will be voted in the manner directed herein by the undersigned shareholder. Proposal 1 has been proposed by the Board of Trustees of the Fund. If no direction is given as to Proposal 1, this proxy will be voted "FOR" Proposal 1. The proxy will be voted in accordance with the holder's best judgment as to any other matters. Date __________________, 2005 ------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------ Signature(s)/Title(s) (if required) (Sign in the Box) Note: Please sign exactly as your name appears hereon. If shares are held jointly, each holder should sign. Corporate proxies should be signed by an authorized officer. Trustees and other fiduciaries should indicate the capacity in which they sign, and where more than one name appears, a majority must sign. DSBF fg Please fill in box(es) as shown using black or blue ink or number 2 pencil. PLEASE DO NOT USE FINE POINT PENS. Please review the proposal listed below carefully. The Board of Trustees of the Fund recommends that you vote in favor of Proposal 1. Proposal 1. To approve a Submanagement Agreement for the Fund between Seix Advisors, the fixed-income division of Trusco Capital Management, Inc., and Domini Social Investments LLC. FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN |_| |_| |_| IMPORTANT! PLEASE SIGN AND DATE ON THE REVERSE SIDE. DSBF fg